User talk:Deshemp

Hey all,

Here are some Wikipedia topics that I found that i think we could expand on.

Interest Groups https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Interest_groups

Public Sector https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Public_sector

Government Administration https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Administration_%28government%29

Public Administration Theory https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Theories_of_administration

Deshemp (talk) 23:15, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Systems Thinking in the Public Sector Sources

Caudle, Sharon L., Wilpen L. Gorr, and Kathryn E. Newcomer. 1991. "Key Information Systems Management Issues for the Public Sector." MIS Quarterly 15, no. 2: 171-188. Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed October 5, 2013). Chlivickas, Eugenijus, and Borisas Melnikas. 2010. "HUMAN RESOURCE IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: EDUCATION AND TRAINING SYSTEMS FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SPECIALISTS." Public Administration (16484541) 3/4, no. 27/28: 61-75. Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed October 5, 2013).

Gharajedaghi, Jamshid. 1999. Systems Thinking : Managing Chaos and Complexity: a Platform for Designing Business Architecture. Boston, Mass: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1999. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost (accessed October 5, 2013).

Checkland, Peter. 2012. "Four Conditions for Serious Systems Thinking and Action." Systems Research & Behavioral Science 29, no. 5: 465-469. Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed October 5, 2013).

Waldman, J. D. 2007. "Thinking systems need systems thinking." Systems Research & Behavioral Science 24, no. 3: 271-284. Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed October 5, 2013).

````

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Deshemp/sandbox (November 20)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Deshemp/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 03:06, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Strategic planning in the public sector

The article Strategic planning in the public sector has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Student essay that would require a fundamental rewrite to meet encyclopedic standards.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:24, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Strategic planning in the public sector for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Strategic planning in the public sector is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strategic planning in the public sector until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:29, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please work in sandbox

I have placed a copy of your work in User:Deshemp/Sandbox so that you can all work on it there. You can ask that it be moved to mainspace when it is in better shape. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 06:06, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]