User talk:Deryck Chan/Archive 5

Page rebuilt on 1.9.2005. Happy talking! Deryc k C. 10:30, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: IPA symbols

brought forward from /Archive 4#Re: IPA symbols and #Hi Deryck

From other Wikipedia articles. :-) As for Sun Yat Sen what can I actually do to improve it? What's wrong with your school article, and which school is it? And I saw your signature template. It's good. :-D — Insta ntnood 13:16, September 1, 2005 (UTC)

See if it fits the FAS. Well... my school... it's La Salle College... not really much of a good school but produces lots of A's... D e ryc k C. 14:23:09, 2005-09-01 (UTC)

yes, there is a variation in Waitau, hek7, not hek8. n I have correct -a to -aa. --K.C. Tang 14:48, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's a great school~! and probably lots to write. What improvement to the two articles would you expect? — Insta ntnood 15:57, September 1, 2005 (UTC)

For Sun Yat-sen, what I expect is, of course, FAC. For my school's article, well, even I myself have no idea about how to improve it. D e ryc k C. 15:44:09, 2005-09-02 (UTC)

Yea of course. But, say, what is lack, and what has to be improved? — Insta ntnood 20:36, September 2, 2005 (UTC)

I don't know what to do for my school's article, but for Sun Yat-sen, well, what you can do at least is to support it when I put it up on FAC. D e ryc k C. 04:55:42, 2005-09-03 (UTC)

Let me know if I can do anything to improve them. :-) — Insta ntnood 19:06, September 3, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. D e ryc k C. 06:47:01, 2005-09-04 (UTC)

FWIW, the symbols you looked for are ɐ and ɔ; very easy to type with SCIM. I still can't read jyutping in its non-IPA form; I really think they should have adopted something more IPA-like. —Wing 19:17, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Sun Yat-sen

(on User talk:Jiang) How could you find out that the materials are copyrighted so easily? Deryck C. 09:24:27, 2005-09-03 (UTC)

I copied and pasted the text into google and then pressed "search". --Ji ang 10:14, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh... D e ryc k C. 10:18:23, 2005-09-03 (UTC)

Do you think, then, this article will succeed if I put it up onto FAC? D e ryc k C. 10:38:44, 2005-09-03 (UTC)

Can we do it soon if possible? I have a three day weekend, so it's easier for me to defend the FAC. Borisblue 13:27, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm doing it now. D e ryc k C. 06:47:21, 2005-09-04 (UTC)

RfA

(originally on User talk:Mcy jerry) Jerry,

Will you accept if I nominate you to RfA?

D e ryc k C. 09:18:16, 2005-09-03 (UTC)

Thanks for your support! But in fact I'm not so sure what I'm going to be and to do if I am nominated... -- Jerry Crimson Mann 15:33, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oops... D e ryc k C. 06:48:29, 2005-09-04 (UTC)

Really~I'm glad to hear that? How do you know that? -- Jerry Crimson Mann 16:27, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

History of Queensland

The History of Queensland article has finally become the current Australian Collaboration. As you voted for it, you might like to visit and improve the article as you see fit. Thanks --Scott Davis ^Talk 14:52, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. D e ryc k C. 09:08, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sun Yat-sen

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (October 2, 1869 – January 30, 1948) (Devanagari: मोहनदास करमचन्द गांधी, Gujarati મોહનદાસ કરમચંદ ગાંધી) This is how the Gandhi article starts. We should give his name(s) in chinese as well. Also, notice that Mao Zedong has a sound file to help foreigners pronounce his name properly. Do you think we can do that? Do you have access to a microphone? Borisblue 18:34, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK, scrap my first point. We're in a bit of trouble. Raul himself says the names section is too long. We'll have to do something about it. Borisblue 23:19, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've cut down the names section, put the stuff in Names of Sun Yat-sen. Raul says there are too many chinese characters in the article. Borisblue 23:39, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I hope the article can make it. D e ryc k C. 09:00:49, 2005-09-05 (UTC)

I think we may have to cut down more chinese words. Do phrases like '譜名' really have to be there? Raul didn't withdraw his objection yet.Borisblue 22:15, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And I think we need Hanyu Pinyin pronounciation for the chinese words we do keep. Do you know all the mandarin pronounciations?

Yep, of course. I study Putonghua for HKCEE ^_^. By the way, I don't think we should take action so quickly - let's wait for one more day before we take action. D e ryc k C. 09:05:49, 2005-09-07 (UTC)

How are we going to handle Jiang's objections? They're pretty overwhelming. Frankly, I've no clue to half of the things he is talking about (Sun got kidnapped in London??) I don't have access to a good biography, so that's a big problem for me. Borisblue 03:17, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re the kidnapping in London, Britannica states, "In 1896, under circumstances not entirely clear, Sun was caught and detained for 13 days by the Chinese legation in London....The legation planned to ship Sun back to China, but, before this could be done, Sun had converted a British employee at the legation to his side and got word through to James Cantlie, former dean of Hong Kong College of Medicine. The British Foreign Office intervened, and Sun was released from his captivity. The incident engendered great publicity and gave Sun's career a powerful boost."

I am sorry that I cannot do much to the article myself due to personal time constraints, but I have access to electronic versions of the Encyclopedia Britannica and Encarta Encyclopedia. If either of you are interested, i can email the info. --Ji ang 03:38, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also quite busy recently - took up a number of posts at school. Maybe you can find Borisblue instead? D e ryc k C. 09:07, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MIND

Deryck, would you mind creating round three for WP:MIND? I'm pretty busy right now; it would be much appreciated. Once you get it done, we can close round two, and have the one unanswered question be carried over. Hopefully we can get Round Three started next Monday at the latest. Thanks! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 23:29, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK. D e ryc k C. 04:32:59, 2005-09-09 (UTC)

Hey Deryck, I know you're pretty busy with Sun Yat-Sen right now, but could you give me a timetable of about when you will finish writing round three so I can inform other people and know when to close round two? Thanks! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 23:57, September 11, 2005 (UTC)

Gimme one more week. D e ryc k C. 09:03:37, 2005-09-12 (UTC)

OK, thanks! Oh yeah, I discovered that AllyUnion has a new user notification bot that I'm itching to try out... Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:57, September 12, 2005 (UTC)

Done!!!!! D e ryc k C. 09:02, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! Looks great, though number 10 part 1 is kind of a gimme :-). When do you wish to open the round? For right now, I'll try and use AllyUnion's bot to leave messages, and I'll tell the participants of round two that round two is now closed, and that round three will open soon. Then, when you decide when you want to open the round (all you have to do is change the current round on the WP:MIND page) either you or I can use the bot to tell them the opening time and date. THanks for your help! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 20:19, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm opening it now to give the players a big surprise. (I suppose nobody is awake currently except me ^_^) D e ryc k C. 07:23, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry, no, you open it yourself at a time you desire to because I don't have regular access to the computer every day. D e ryc k C. 07:26, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MIND 22:08, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

Challenge yourself, and get ready to think!

Hello! Thank you for participating in Round Two of the Wikipedia:Mind Benders! The round will officially close on Friday, September 16, and round three (which is complete) will be open in the immediate days after that. A notice will be sent to you at least 48 hours before round three is set to open, to insure fairness. Round three offers 11 new exciting questions, this time written by Deryck C.. Please be sure to join in the fun! Also, congratulations to Riffsyphon1024 for winning our logo competition! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 20:30, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy using the NotificationBot (thanks to AllyUnion for designing such a great bot!). If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. If there are any problems with the bot, please alert AllyUnion. Thanks!

Automatic notification done by NotificationBot ((talk). Any bugs or errors, please report to bot owner. --NotificationBot 22:08, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. D e ryc k C. 07:32, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll open it. Just a slight problem- AllyUnion has disabled NotificationBot for a script overhaul, and I'm not sure when it will be back up; I promised that I would notify everyone at least 48 hours before round three opens. And I'm not about to leave messages on all 50+ user talk pages, now that I've seen the wonders of NotificationBot... Thanks for all your help! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 23:49, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lemme correct the questions now... D e ryc k C.

User Categorization

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Hong Kong page as living in or being associated with Hong Kong. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Hong Kong Wikipedians for instructions. Rmky87 17:46, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Understand. D e ryc k C. 10:22, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you got my message. Rmky87 19:10, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've added myself to the new category. D e ryc k C. 08:38, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MIND 06:21, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Hello, Deryck Chan/Archive 5! This message is to inform you that round three of Wikipedia Mind Benders will open on Wednesday, September 21, at approximately 22:00 UTC. While the opening time may vary by two or three hours, the round will open no earlier than 22:00 UTC. In addition, there are several rule changes, which will be detailed when the round opens. Everyone who answers a question correctly will receive points, but speed does give some extra points! Round three offers 11 new exciting and mind-bogglind questions, written by Deryck C.. These promise to be lots of fun! We sincerely hope you join us.

Also, congratulations to ROYGBIV for winning round two; it was an extremely close game, with the runner-up, Spondoolicks, only two points behind. Let's keep round three competitive! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:31, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy using the NotificationBot (thanks to AllyUnion for designing such a great bot!). If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. If there are any problems with the bot, please alert AllyUnion. Thanks!

Automatic notification done by NotificationBot ((talk). Any bugs or errors, please report to bot owner. --NotificationBot 06:21, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you notification bot. D e ryc k C. 07:46, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've opened round three; you may wish to add the answer pages to your watchlist. Have fun reading the responses! (I sure did last round!) Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 02:37, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Real thanks. But I'll delay the marking as much as possible to conform with the new scoring system (in fact, to attract more players). D e ryc k C. 07:52, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good work, Deryck! I just glanced over the page today, saw that number 9 was unanswered, and decided to take a crack at it. I've commented out the rest of my message to make sure no one inadvertantly reads it: Anyways, even if I did get the correct answer, I don't want to enter, as I don't think the maintainers should participate- let the contestants figure it out! :-) Good work, though. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 12:46, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, good coder in both maths and computer. D e ryc k C. 14:47, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi from Catalonia

I saw you are in Project ECHO. It seems me agood idea. I'm bilingual catalan and spanish and I can speak more or less english and french, so I think I could help. If you look at calana wikipedia and see something interesting, I can help in translations, I'm Barcelona there: http://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuari:Barcelona Please, leave me a message! (please, not in chinese :) ) --62.175.92.90 16:24, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Message left at ca:usuari:Barcelona. Thanks. D e ryc k C. 06:09, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Opening of Lam Tin Station

Hello Deryck have you got a picture of the plaque? Thanks. :-) — Insta ntnood 09:24, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Erm... I can go there and take a photo, maybe tonight, maybe later this week. D e ryc k C. 06:10, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MIND... again

Hello, Deryck! First, thanks for supporting me in my mediation committee request; I'm pleased to say that I'm now an official mediator. Second, wonderful job in round three. Now that the pattern has been established, do you want to alternate writing/maintaining rounds every two rounds? I wrote one and two, you wrote three and four, then I'll write five and six, etc. Sound fair to you? That way, we can get a rest in between rounds, yet still get to write them and throw the players off! (wink, wink) Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 20:08, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Do you know how to use the NotificationBot? You could either set up the chron and messages yourself to notify Round Four opening (see User:NotificationBot/Mind Benders), or just let me know, and I'll be happy to set up the chron (it's not that hard, though). Make sure you give people some time before it's open. :-) Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 20:11, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I know how to use that bot, but I really prefer to know how to write a bot myself ^_^ D e ryc k C. 12:25, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've been one since August. Thanks anyways. So you'll write round four, and then we can alternate every two rounds? By the way, check out this post on my talk page regarding the scoring system. If you don't use that method for round four, I might try it out for round five. What do you think? Thanks. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 19:08, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think that I can be an admin? XD D e ryc k C. 07:17, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MIND multipliers

I take your point about encouraging people to keep answering, but also reward the first person to answer. It's a difficult balance to strike, and as far as I can see, there's never going to be a perfect answer. A little bit of tweaking for each round might get us closer to something more suitable eventually. I see no problem with taking risks like this, because it's not as if the results actually matter.

I think the multipliers probably need to be reduced a bit. Four is probably a bit too much. Another option might be to have questions that can have multiple answers (such as the question with alternating Is from the last round), and give bonuses to each new answer given.

(Also, I see from the Mindbenders page that I happened to get more answers right than the actual winner. I did mention this scenario on Flcelloguy's talk page, but honestly didn't realise that was the case here. I really hope neither of you think I'm grumbling because I came second, because I'm absolutely not. It was the fact that I jumped from mid-table mediocrity right to second by getting the gray wolf question with its huge multiplier that made me realise the scoring wasn't quite right).

The most important thing - the questions - are excellent, so as long as that standard is maintained, I don't suppose the scoring really matters in the grand scheme of things. KeithD (talk) 08:26, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The thing itself brings leisure. I don't hope it turns out to bring tension. (Just like RFA and FAC) D e ryc k C. 14:41, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar?

How do you give someone a barnstar? Is there a

programming code for it? By the way, thanks for the award.:C2 aaron 13:15, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, manual work, and I give it as I like. D e ryc k C. 11:21, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, what I mean is this: If you, type to someone saying, you're

awarding them a barnstar, how does the pic of it, get on the page? C2 aaron 12:55, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking me so many questions. When I was a newbie, I was really like you, running around and CREATING disputes, blowing up (not out) fires. I hope you can ask me whatever you don't understand so that I can help you. I can see your ambition and devotion to the wiki. D e ryc k C. 14:36, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Regarding The Missing Barnstar

Thanks, I'll get on the page soon as I can, sorry for the misunderstanding there. Please feel free to award a barnstar to me, I figured my barnstar was missing, thus the idea for mine! Karmafist 16:50, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Much thanks. The whole BAP and KC teams will thank you. D e ryc k C. 14:37, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I updated your words on Wikipedia:Barnstars on Wikipedia a little. Man, you are getting such a vote from me on your Rfa. You rock, my friend. Karmafist 17:55, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Admin

You are definitely qualified to be an admin! You have enough edits spread across the namespaces, and have even promoted one- two?- featured articles. However, the only thing (from what I see) that could possibly not get you promoted is your time on Wikipedia. Recently, there have been people voting oppose if the candidate has been here less than three months. Since you're so close to reaching your three month status (disregarding those September 2004 edits), you might as well wait another week before nominating yourself. If you want, I would be willing to nominate you in a week — you definitely are qualified! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 20:15, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I didn't notice your previous account. In that case, if you want me to nominate you now, I'd be happy to do so! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 20:18, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Whenever you find suitable and with a high chance of success, I hope so. D e ryc k C. 09:55, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

SCOTW

Hey Deryck, wondering the status of nominated articles on SCOTW, that are well past there nomination period, can I remove them , or would you like to, or is the policy to leave them a while, just tring to be helpful! Adenosine | Talk 06:01, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's my own policy. As the number of candidates is relatively low, it's an unwise choice to prune the candidates without enough votes. If we really do that pruning, the SCOTW will shut down due to the running out of candidates. D e ryc k C. 09:57, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't win!

I didn't jointly win WP:MIND. There was nothing to suggest the winner would be split between the person who got the most points and the most answers, it only suggested most points. I think it would be a good idea to do that in future, if any scoring adjustments don't prevent it from happening again, but it's unfair on Clarkefreak who won fair and square. He shouldn't have to share his glory because of rules thought up after the event. KeithD (talk) 11:13, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then as you wish. Let's celebrate for Clarkefreak. D e ryc k C. 11:16, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. Well done him. ...I'll crush him next time though! KeithD (talk) 11:17, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome. But you might have to wait because I'm stuck with something else and couldn't think of any questions for the next round... D e ryc k C. 11:59, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want me to take round four, then? The switch every two rounds thing was meant as a general guideline; we can of course ask the other person to fill in if life gets too busy. And I'm not busy right now, either. :-) Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 14:42, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deryck for RfA?

As for adminship, I'm going to wait a week, when your current account hits 3 months. Hope you're not in a rush, otherwise I can do it now if you wish. :-) Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 14:43, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wait until waiting cannot significantly maximize my chance of success. D e ryc k C. 14:53, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

True, but it never hurts, does it? I would be more than happy to nominate you now, if you desire. Do you wish for me to write round four? Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 14:59, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'll prefer you write it, but I won't mind it you want me to do so. The admin thing: as you like. D e ryc k C. 15:03, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll take care of round four then. I'll nominate you for adminship now; I'll have it done in a few minutes. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 15:05, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Check out WP:RfA. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 15:14, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wow... D e ryc k C. 15:37, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron: The image should have a code like this. D e ryc k C. 16:29, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You probably want to read the suggested links on the WP:RfA page, but "sysop chores" are mainly the extra duties that we have: deleting pages (and closing AfDs), blocking users, reverting vandalism, etc. The rollback button is very useful, as well. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 15:45, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deryck, voting support for yourself on RfA is against the standard on the page, and people have voted oppose before just because the candidate voted for himself (which is, I repeat, against the norm). I would highly recommend that you remove your own vote. Thnaks! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 16:04, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thanks. Is that a written rule or just a tradition? D e ryc k C. 16:12, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's not an official rule, and it's not written down anywhere. It's just that it's against the custom, and users in the past who voted for themselves have sparked controversy (usually opposing the user) about his/her votes for themselves. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 16:20, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeh, I really need to rely on you to learn the customs. D e ryc k C. 16:26, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I think that's a very bad idea — even notifying people about an RfA is seen as "ballot-stuffing" and is already controversial; using a bot is even worse. If you want people to know about your RfA, you could post a message on your user and user talk pages, or include a link in your signature. And Deryck, please don't let any comments on your RfA deter you- understand that everyone is here for Wikipedia, and that you should regard every comment made as constructive criticism. Continue your excellent work, and I'm sure your RfA will fare better in the future. Good luck. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 16:43, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I never thought of a high chance of success ever since you nominated me because I know that what I've done 3 months ago will CERTAINLY pull me to failure. D e ryc k C. 16:47, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Barn Award

Scimitar was right in his comments for the most part in my opinion(voting for yourself is ok, but usually not a good idea). Despite that, we all make mistakes, and your help to me was invaluable regardless of whatever anybody else says. Therefore, per my tradition, i'm giving you an entire barn instead of just a barnstar in honor of my support for you in RfA. Feel free to put vandals in there or practice your guitar or whatever! Karmafist 18:24, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!!!! You may also leave a message at your user page and redirect people to support me. Deryc k C. ^RfA 01:10, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've put you as one of the recipients of the Barn Award, which I hope someday will be significant enough to have some weight in itself to sway others ;-) Karmafist 01:55, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Since You're An HTML Expert...

Is there a way to put in stripes in Hexadecimal? Just wondering b/c I'd like to make userboxes for people who practice Taekwondo (like myself) and some of the belts are in between one color and another (for example, i'm at a Green Stripe, which is yellow with a Green Stripe across it). Karmafist 23:54, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What code does your color come from? Deryc k C. ^RfA 01:21, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RGB I suppose. I was thinking I'd make a userbox similiar to those found at Wikipedia:Babel and have a stripe going through instead of having it all one color. Karmafist 01:55, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch, you wanta have stripes on the userbox? It's just impossible for wikipedia unless with the use of images. Deryc k C. ^RfA 02:18, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, maybe more of a bar across the middle, similiar to a Tricolor on a flag, but I couldn't figure out how to put that in either. Maybe I should make an image instead of a Userbox anyhow. Karmafist 03:12, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lemme try with my own sandbox... Deryc k C. ^RfA 03:56, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done!!!! This time not just HTML, but lots of CSS are used x_x Deryc k C. ^RfA 04:17, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your text here. Thank you.
D e ryc k C.

Click edit to view the source code. Wiki markup sucks. Deryc k C. ^RfA 04:23, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

Regarding your question, "is" generally is used for talking about things in the third person, while "am" is used to talk about yourself. Bart133 (t) 04:26, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
But it's first person (starting from I), isn't it? Deryc k C. ^RfA 04:35, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: After you

Frankly I'm having more or less the same concerns as David Gerard, Ryan Norton and Jossi. I don't know much about your involvements in the mind benders. Would be better to wait for a month or so after you've made more edits.. to more articles. :-) — Insta ntnood 19:57, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Spoken Wikipedia

Regarding your comment on Spoken Wikipedia, I'm fairly new to the project but I'm sure everyone would like to have a spoken version of Sun Yat-sen, especially since it is coming up as featured. I recently recorded my first article, bicycle lighting, using Audacity. If you haven't already, take a look at the recording guidelines; I found them helpful. Please let me know if I can be of any help! -SCEhardt 21:09, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Deryck-- Thank you for your kind words and support on my RfA. I have tried hard since the personal attack to build community here. I have come a long way and aprreciate your support. Cheers. --Lord Vold e mort ^{(Dark Mark)|My RfA} 15:53, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The best way to give thanks is, of course, to vote back on my RfA ^^ Deryc k C. 15:56, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

While I will not vote while my RfA is in progress, I will have a look when it is finished. Cheers. --Lord Vold e mort ^{(Dark Mark)|My RfA} 16:06, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good, that means I may be able to have one or two last-minute votes. Deryc k C. 16:14, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not promising a Support vote, rather, just a look. See ya around. --Lord Vold e mort ^{(Dark Mark)|My RfA} 16:20, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Neither am I saying that I've secured a last-minute vote. I just said I may be able to get it. Deryc k C. 16:24, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Touché. Point taken. 8^) Cheers. --Lord Vold e mort ^{(Dark Mark)|My RfA} 16:32, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. Good language. Deryc k C. 16:34, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship

Hi, Deryck! I figured I'd better come by and drop off a note. Please don't take offense to anything I've said about you at your RfA; I had a negative impression of you, and have since had that impression changed into a positive one. I trust you as an editor, and the only reason I'm not supporting you as an admin is because I just don't know how you'd handle all the political garbage that comes with the job. I've been surprised at how much garbage I've had to put up with as an admin, and I'd be the first to admit that I haven't always done a good job of it. Best wishes, and let me say again that I hope I've caused you no offense.--Scimitar ^parley 17:34, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Deryc k C. 16:57, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Answers re: my RfA

Hi Deryck! Have you had a chance to review the answer I provided to your questions on my RfA? I hope it addresses your concerns. If not, please drop me a line on my Talk page. Thank you! Owen× ☎ 17:33, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Switched to support. Deryc k C. 16:59, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

I think you are mistaken about the idea for RFA - I believe this is not a vote for a school club president and is more akin to seeking permission to contribute further to this project.

You give me the impression that you believe "administratorship" is a prize or a privileged position and is "campaigning" for it when in fact it is not makes me uncomfortable about supporting you.

--JuntungWu 11:23, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe. Anyway your oppose vote certainly took me to failure. Thanks very much. Deryc k C. 17:25, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiwoohoo's RfA

Hey Deryck Chan. Thanks for voting in support of my RfA. Unfortunately you are currently in the minority ;) but I'm taking all comments on board to help me improve. Wikiwoohoo 14:55, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on Sun Yat-Sen

It was Featured Article today, too bad you missed it due to your wiki-break. Thanks again for the box, I'll nominate you for Admin again in a few months, this time just don't campaign so much ;-) Karmafist 15:24, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Short break

Hi Deryck, I note you're taking a break - probably a good idea after the Afd which must have been a bit disappointing for you. I think you'll bounce back and get in easily in, say, two months time. Everyone is impressed by your editing and if you're not seen to be campaigning, a lot of people who opposed this time round will change their mind. Good luck and don't take it to heart. Dlyons493 Talk 20:09, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sun Yat Sen FARC

Just to let you know Jiang's put it up. Borisblue 23:59, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re:WP:MIND

Actually, I was waiting for the NotificationBot to be brought up, but AllyUnion has since indicated that it might be a while. Do you want to copy and paste an announcement to half of the 50+ people at User:NotificationBot/Mind Benders? If you do, let me know — I was planning on doing the annoucement this weekend, but if you're willing to help me copy the announcement, we can bump it up and perhaps open it this weekend. As indicated on the original message that I had planned to send out, Round 4 will be vastly different, with time not playing an important factor. Part I will be... interesting, and part II will open after part I closes. Part II should be more like the traditional Mind Benders, but will also have several changes to connect it to part I. You'll see. :-) Thanks a lot! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 23:12, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think you can just copy and paste the message sometime today? (i.e. within the next 24 hours) There's 50 people on the list; if we split the notification up, it should only take about half an hour or so per person to notify. Let me know. Thanks. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 20:19, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MIND

Hello. Round four of Wikipedia Mind Benders will open on Thursday, December 1. This round will be drastically different from round three; part one will consist of a creative project, and part two will be developed from there. The full details will be released when the round opens. Time and speed should not be major factors in this round; thus, there is no exact opening time for the round as speed will not factor into the scoring. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 00:04, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Please add Wikipedia:Mind Benders/to do to your watchlist to receive further announcements; the NotificationBot is currently down and all notifications will be placed on that page. Sorry for any inconvenience.

Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy. If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. Special thanks to Fetofs for helping distribute this message.

robot

hello Deryck, do u operate a bot? need ur help. --K.C. Tang 01:38, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Science collaboration of the week

You voted for Human genome to be improved while it was listed on WP:IDRIVE. This article is now nominated on Wikipedia:Science collaboration of the week. Please consider supporting it with your vote. --Fenice 13:14, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem RE: Image:Lei Yue Mun Interchange.jpg

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lei Yue Mun Interchange.jpg. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law. We need you to specify two things on the image description page:

The copyright holder, and
The copyright status

Since you created this image, you are the copyright holder.

Because of the large number of images on Wikipedia, we've sorted them using image copyright tags. Just find the right tag corresponding to the copyright status of this image, and paste it onto the image description page like this: {{TAGHERE}}.

There are 3 basic ways to licence an image on Wikipedia:

The copyright holder gets the best protection of their work by licencing it under an open content license such as the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence. If you have the express permission of the copyright holder to licence their work under the above licence, use the image copyright tag: {{cc-by-sa-2.5}}. The GNU Free Documentation License is another option. Again, if you have the express permission of the copyright holder, use the tag {{GFDL}}.

The copyright holder can also release their work into the public domain. See here for examples.

For more information, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. Please remember that untagged images are likely to be deleted.

If you have uploaded other images without including copyright tags, please go back and tag them. Also, please tag all images that you upload in the future. If you have any questions, just leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again. ~MDD 46 96 04:47, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've tagged it properly, thanks! ~MDD 46 96 22:16, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me so. Deryck C. 03:33, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

COTW

You voted for Physical oceanography and this article is now the current Science Collaboration of the Month!
Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia science article.

advanced level of English

Hello Deryck, it amused me to find you been responsible for some of the English chemistry articles on here, since I obviously know you already from webelements.com ... it is indeed a small world! :) I don't want to be rude, but are you sure you should consider yourself to have an "advanced" level of English. Over the years reading your postings, I find many of your grammatical/sentence constructions a little, erm, idiosyncratic :) Also, please go easy on us homosexualists, eh? PSML. Love, --feline1 10:29, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. In fact I've been considering switching to "intermediate" since my English was being badly complained when I was on RFA. So I'm doing it now. Deryck C. 10:39, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think that would be more appropriate, Deryck ;-) --feline1 12:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tak Tin Bus Terminus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tak Tin Bus Terminus.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Stan 16:32, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Optimization" of GCD

I'm not convinced that your "optimized" version of the Euclidean Algorithm is actually an optimization (does it actually run faster? It seems that every operation present in the one is present in the other) or contributes to an understanding of this algorithm. Is there any particular reason you feel this needs to be there? --Dantheox 17:17, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Favor

Done, and replied at the talk page. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 22:27, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]