Jump to content

User talk:DerpGunKV2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"BRING ME YOUR MESSAGES. MESSAGE! MESSAGE! MESSAGE!"

(drop your message here)

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, DerpGunKV2, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

DerpGunKV2, good luck, and have fun. NYC Guru (talk) 05:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article referencing

[edit]

Hi — I've come across your three article creations on my new page patrol rounds, and wanted to ask what your plans are for supporting them with references? There are currently some external links provided, but some of them are not cited through footnotes, so it's difficult to know which statements in the article are supported by which sources (and which aren't supported by any). Also, at least some of the sources may not be reliable, in the sense of WP:RS. For these reasons, the articles don't really pass the notability test (see WP:GNG), either, as it stands. I was going to move the articles into the draft space, but then I thought I'd ask you first for your comments? Cheers, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:43, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Object 416. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:31, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:34, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Churchill tank, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 05:02, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

T-55-64 moved to draftspace - unsourced

[edit]

An article you recently created, T-55-64, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:37, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: T-55-64 (April 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by -noah- were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Noah 💬 15:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, DerpGunKV2! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Noah 💬 15:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello DerpGunKV2! Your additions to Luchs (tank) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Panzer III Ausf. A

[edit]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Panzer III Ausf. A has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/germany/panzer_iii. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — Diannaa (talk) 17:26, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Panzer III Ausf. A moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Panzer III Ausf. A, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 05:54, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Panzer I Ausf. F

[edit]

Hello, DerpGunKV2,

Thank you for creating Panzer I Ausf. F.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

We need a lot more refences than this, a lot of this is unsourced.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slatersteven (talk) 12:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Versuchskampffahrzeug

[edit]
Notice

The article Versuchskampffahrzeug has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable, unreferenced; unlikely search term on English-language wikipedia

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:42, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UAZ-3303 moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, UAZ-3303, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 16:20, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Somua S35 CA (May 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
More than one reference in reliable sources are required to demonstrate notability for the topic that only exists in blueprints.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 11:54, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't copy material you find elsewhere online

[edit]

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the copyright policy of this website to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. The Wikipedia copyright policy and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. There's a simplified version of our copyright rules at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Further copyright issues will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🇨🇦 (talk) 12:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Diannaa (talk) 19:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DerpGunKV2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Diannaa, I have read through the comments written on my talk page and understand the serious violations I have committed. I apologize for the mistakes I have made as I am new to Wikipedia and did not understand the rules here. I also did not check my messages as I did not know what it entails. I do hope that you can unblock me so that I can correct the articles I have made. And I also forgot to mention that all sources found online are protected by copyright. Thank you. DerpGunKV2 (talk) 00:42, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

  • What is copyright?
  • How is Wikipedia licenced?
  • Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
  • Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
  • How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 13:46, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DerpGunKV2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In order:
*Copyright is a type of intellectual property that protects original works of authorship as soon as an author fixes the work in a tangible form of expression.
*The text of Wikipedia is copyrighted by Wikipedia editors and contributors and is formally licensed to the public under one or several liberal licenses.
*Because the database servers are located in the United States, Wikipedia is subject to US copyright law in this matter and may not host material which infringes US copyright law.
*Fair use allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder for purposes such as criticism, parody, news reporting, research and scholarship, and teaching.
*Always assume that all work is copyrighted. Do not copy, share or alter without permission. Review and retain licensing agreements. Have an IP policy for your business. Talk to your lawyer. DerpGunKV2 (talk) 01:57, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your response to being blocked for copyright violations is to copy-paste text into your unblock request? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:25, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DerpGunKV2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Diannaa, I have read through the comments written on my talk page and understand the serious violations I have committed. I apologize for the mistakes I have made as I am new to Wikipedia and did not understand the rules here. I also did not check my messages as I did not know what it says. I do hope that you can unblock me so that I can correct the articles I have made. DerpGunKV2 (talk) 02:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

To quote Yamla,

"In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

  • What is copyright?
  • How is Wikipedia licenced?
  • Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
  • Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
  • How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked."

[1] Chetsford (talk) 07:58, 13 June 2021 (UTC) [reply]

References

  1. ^ Yamla. "Revision as of 13:46, 3 June 2021". wiki.riteme.site/User_talk:DerpGunKV2. Wikipedia. Retrieved June 13, 2021.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DerpGunKV2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In order:
*Copyright gives full ownership over intellectual property.
*by Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.
*because all sources are copyrighted by owners.
*Fair use.
*I will make sure that I do not violate the copyright rule by writing the articles in my own words and use Copyvio Detector and Copyleaks to check if the articles are in violation of any copyrights. Furthermore, I will delete the pictures that I have posted on the articles without any license.

Decline reason:

I don't understand what the response to Diannaa's question below means, but it doesn't give me any confidence that you understand what was wrong with the image you uploaded on commons. The answers provided above are just namechecks, you haven't shown that you understand what terms like 'Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike' or 'Fair use' actually mean. I'm also concerned that you would feel the need to run a Copyvio Detector check on your own prose - if you've written the content yourself, you already know that it's not a copyright violation. It sounds like you intend to copy sources and then change just enough of the words to fool an automated check, which is discussed at WP:CLOP. As such, I cannot accept this request. Girth Summit (blether) 13:44, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am NOT lying, NOR to fool an automated check, BUT to edit and contribute to this encyclopedia. DerpGunKV2 (talk) 06:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: T-55-64 (June 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Doric Loon was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I'm sorry, but this was declined once before on the basis of inadequate sourcing and has been resubmitted with no new sources added. That was never going to pass. It would really help to have a good English-language source, though there is no rule saying you can't have Russian ones. I'm also uncertain how this article relates to T-54/T-55 - is there a partial overlap? It may well be that what is needed is additional work on existing articles.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Doric Loon (talk) 18:14, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:UAZ-3303

[edit]

Information icon Hello, DerpGunKV2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:UAZ-3303, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:UAZ-3303

[edit]

Hello, DerpGunKV2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "UAZ-3303".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:24, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:T-55-64

[edit]

Information icon Hello, DerpGunKV2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:T-55-64, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:T-55-64

[edit]

Hello, DerpGunKV2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "T-55-64".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:51, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DerpGunKV2&oldid=1247931019"