User talk:Derek Coburn

Welcome!

Hello, Derek Coburn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Robert Pierre (musician), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! κaτaʟaveno^T_C 04:08, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Robert Pierre (musician)"

A page you created, Robert Pierre (musician), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is a blatant copyright infringement.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. κaτaʟaveno^T_C 04:08, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you

The article you created: Worm (2007 film) may be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worm (2007 film) .

The faster you respond on this page, the better chance the article you created can be saved.

Finding sources which mention the topic of your article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted {{Findsources3}}:

Find sources for Worm (2007 film) : google news recent, google news old, google books, google scholar, NYT recent, NYT old, a9, msbooks, msacademic ...You can then cite these results in the Article for deletion discussion.

Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:

List the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
You can request a mentor to help explain all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.
When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.
Here is a list acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.
You can vote to merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 02:37, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Benjiman

An article that you have been involved in editing, Benjiman, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjiman. Thank you. Raven1977 ^{Talk to me}_{My edits} 18:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Kasabian2G.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Kasabian2G.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 21:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC) --Peripitus (Talk) 21:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Repost of Benjiman

A tag has been placed on Benjiman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Pstanton (talk) 05:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Lizzy 039 a384af88-38ab-441b-8d39-76be19ea1c08.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Lizzy 039 a384af88-38ab-441b-8d39-76be19ea1c08.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 01:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC) --Peripitus (Talk) 01:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Rp_side2.jpg

Hello. Concerning your upload of the image File:Rp_side2.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted images obtained from other sources, without the permission of the author(s). This image appears to be a direct copy from http://1cubed.com/images/rp_side2.jpg. As a copyright violation, File:Rp_side2.jpg falls under the speedy deletion criteria and has been deleted.

If you believe that the image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under a free license then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave me a message explaining the details and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the <pick a free licence> or released into the public domain leave me a message at my talk page with a link to where I can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Rp_side2.jpg]].
Or alternately drop me a note about this file if I have misunderstood something.
- Peripitus (Talk) 01:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Robert Pierre, at Stage 2008.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Robert Pierre, at Stage 2008.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please could you not upload images to Wikipedia that you've found on the Web. You are violating the copyright of numerous photographers. Please read WP:IMAGE to get greater insight into how and which images can be uploaded to Wikipedia. Please also note that your film, "Worms", was deleted; that does not allow you to copy/paste that deleted article on your non-notable film to your userpage. I have removed it. If you require any help or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 17:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Your recent edit to the page Dreamcast 2 appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 18:49, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Scene Simulation

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Digital Scene Simulation, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://design.osu.edu/carlson/history/tree/iii.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:25, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Dreamcast.png

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Dreamcast.png, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Dreamcast.png appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Dreamcast.png has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Dreamcast.png and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at File talk:Dreamcast.png with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Dreamcast.png.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 04:20, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Dreamcast-console-w00t.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Dreamcast-console-w00t.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 18:49, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excess detail in plot summaries

Hi Derek, I'm responding to your edit in the Plot section of Who Framed Roger Rabbit. Please don't add extraneous details to plot summaries. A summary is supposed to be a brief overview of the story's most important aspects. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines and Wikipedia:How to write a plot summary. —Codrdan (talk) 01:47, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sequel to Dreamcast listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sequel to Dreamcast. Since you had some involvement with the Sequel to Dreamcast redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dreamcast 2 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dreamcast 2. Since you had some involvement with the Dreamcast 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robert Pierre (musician)

The article Robert Pierre (musician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet the notability guideline for musicians

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Pierre (musician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Pierre (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Pierre (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:12, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]