User talk:Department of Cheese

Welcome!

Hello, Department of Cheese, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:56, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Department of Cheese, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Department of Cheese! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 17:40, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A318

Hello. I'm just having a look over at the article Airbus A318 that you have just recently reviewed. In hindsight, I think the pass of the GAN was perhaps a bit premature. Having done searches on the archives of Flight International and Aviation Week, there is a lot of missing information on the designs, negotiations and politics of both the AE31X and A318 programmes. In addition, the article is missing some references as well. I must admit, I thought the article was fine on 25 June. However, I'm thinking of putting it up for GA reassessment. What are your thoughts? Regards, --Sp33dyphil (talk) 10:11, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk

The article Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 03:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]