User talk:Denton0826

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to New Party (United States), you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Also, see the talk page archives. This was discussed extensively and the "fact" was determined to be false. Loonymonkey (talk) 20:46, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It just so happens that the source(s) and the facts in this case are 100% accurate. You may not like it but facts, as they say, are stubborn things. In this case I have multiple sources I will be referencing and if I find that they have been removed I will take the proper recourse with Wikipedia to assure it does not happen again. --Denton0826 (talk) 22:04, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at New Party (United States) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Loonymonkey (talk) 23:33, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Kuru (talk) 00:51, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]