User talk:Demoss1

Welcome!

Hello, Demoss1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Rklawton (talk) 04:17, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use Wikipedia to promote conspiracy theories or frauds. The links above will give you a better idea about how we operate. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rklawton (talk) 04:17, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Rklawton (talk) 05:13, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

- Rklawton (talk) 06:15, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Jayron32 05:42, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Demoss1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The Stanley Meyer's water fuel cell Article is missing vital information for the text and is being intentionally made misleading, Reference to a living person "Michael Laughton" is not allowed at Wikipeia, Professor of Electrical Engineering at Queen Mary, University of London and Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering in 1990 and was with Admiral Anthony Griffin's group,as documented elsewhere (Electronics World & Wireless World, January 1991 and was not part of trail in 1996 as repeatidly entered by wikipedia.

Decline reason:

All of that may be so, but this unblock request does not address the reason for your block, your behavior, or how you will avoid future conflicts. TN X Man 14:30, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

== June 2010 ==

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Shimeru 07:59, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, please attempt to seek consensus for your changes on the article's talk page, if they are reverted; see WP:BRD. Spurious nominations for deletion are extremely disruptive, as is edit-warring. If in the future you continue not to attempt to discuss and work with others, but instead continue on your current course of action, it is very likely that you'll find yourself indefinitely blocked. Please take some time to review Wikipedia policy and reconsider your approach to editing the Stanley Meyer's water fuel cell article. Shimeru 08:04, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Wikipedia Team editors, please don't misunderstand my intentions, I am purely seeking that the article be entered in trufuly to reflect the true documented facts,as "The Stanley Meyer's water fuel cell Article is missing vital information for the text and is being intentionally made misleading, Reference to a living person "Michael Laughton" is not allowed at Wikipeia, Professor of Electrical Engineering at Queen Mary, University of London and Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering in 1990 and was with Admiral Anthony Griffin's group,as documented elsewhere (Electronics World & Wireless World, January 1991 and was not part of trail in 1996 as repeatidly entered by wikipedia. I kindly appeal you make these simple corrects to replfect the truth please. No other issue, I am trying to do this correctly , but seam to be receiving some serious resistance to this minor change?" Suspected sock. ==

I strongly suspect this user is a sock of banned user User:Big wheels keeps on turning - aside from a commonality of editing style. This is a single-use account, fixated on Stanley Meyer's water fuel cell and that the specific edits tying that article to Admiral Sir Anthony Griffin which is a fairly obscure connection that User:Big wheels keeps on turning was also fixated upon. Hence I urge a permanent block on this account. SteveBaker (talk) 03:25, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I'm not a check-user, but it looks like a case of WP:DUCK Rklawton (talk) 03:35, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]