User talk:Dejo~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello Dejo~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you contribute to our articles here...we need all the people we can get :D. Some guidelines that may help you are:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Chooserr

History section on Bangladesh

Thanks for your edits to the History and other sections on Bangladesh. One point I want to mention is that the main article for history of BD is History of Bangladesh. The convention for Country level articles is that the main article points to topic-level pages, and gives a brief overview of each topic. So, the history page should contain brief discussions of the stuff from the actual history article. The history section in the BD article has becoeme too long over the last few months, so you might consider contributing detailed history to the History of Bangladesh article.

by the way, we do have a wikiproject Bangaldesh. Check that out to find more topics to explore.

Thanks.

--Ragib 19:31, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RE: History section on Bangladesh

Ragib,

In my view, Bangladesh is a good start, but should be expanded considerably before it reaches the level of maturity that some of the other Country-level articles have (e.g. Mexico,Canada) many of which I have read. Of course you are right that each section, such as History, should be further detailed in separate entries. History of Bangladesh should itself be expanded, especially in certain areas like the Mughal period. After all, there is a lot that is left out.

Also, I would like to see these entries better referenced and will try to help in that regard.

Take care,

Dejo 22:36, 11 December 2005 (UTC)Dejo[reply]

The problem is, to get Bangladesh up to a Featured article status, the history section should really be a summary of the History of Bangladesh article. See India, which has been elected a featured article, and has a very brief History section that correctly summarizes the History of India article. Right now, the size of Bangladesh is more than 33 KB, which is more than the standard for article sizes. --Ragib 23:19, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

History of Bangladesh is currently in poor shape which makes it difficult to base a summary on it. For example, most of it deals with pre-Bangladeshi history with only 3 paragraphs covering 1971 until the present. The introduction is inappropriate (it is not a synopsis) and appears to be lifted verbatim from the US State Department without reference.

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:D-8.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:D-8.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image

There is discussion regarding your graph on the Income tax in the United States article as well as the image talk. Morphh ^(talk) 13:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Cafe_standards.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Cafe_standards.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Dejo (talk) 18:26, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Your image US Debt Trend.svg might be more informative if you shaded according to the party in control of the legislature rather than the president since it is Congress that approves the budget. At the least, you could create another image with this information if you don't want to alter this one too drastically. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.187.0.164 (talk) 20:54, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like an interesting idea, although I don't know if you have fully thought it through. For example, what would you do when Congress is split - shade in gray? I would say both the President and the Congress play important roles here, I would not like to say which is more important. Actually, the red and blue shading was not done by me. It was added to my image by someone else. I would certainly be interested in ideas of how to show both President and Congress on the same figure, without getting too cluttered. Dejo (talk) 18:14, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh FAR nom

I have nominated Bangladesh for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. -- Cirt (talk) 05:10, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FARC: Bangladesh

Hey mate, how much more work is required to keep the article an FA? I'm willing to work on it as much I can. Please, answer to the FARC page. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 04:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your elector and representative apportionment charts

Hola! I love your elector and Representative apportionment charts, the latter of which I've added to the House article. Any chance you could make a similar one for the Senate? :)

Thanks, Mdiamante (talk) 17:57, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:US_Debt_Trend.svg

I noticed that this debt trend chart needs updating. I can help you update it if you still have the spreadsheet or similar chart generation tool you used to make the file in the first place. johnpseudo 14:47, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Dejo. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Dejo~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:23, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

12:02, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dejo~enwiki. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Cafe standards.png

The file File:Cafe standards.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Islamic Bill of Rights for Women in the Mosque for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Islamic Bill of Rights for Women in the Mosque is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic Bill of Rights for Women in the Mosque (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Iskandar323 (talk) 19:17, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]