User talk:Deedeedee Andy

IM A LEAN MEAN VANDALIZIN MACHINE

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to EEF1G, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: EEF1G was changed by Deedeedee Andy (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-02-26T17:28:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:28, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Autumn Affair. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Autumn Affair was changed by Deedeedee Andy (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-02-26T17:29:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:29, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jeepers Futsal Club, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Jeepers Futsal Club was changed by Deedeedee Andy (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-02-26T17:30:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:30, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Leah Navarro, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Leah Navarro was changed by Deedeedee Andy (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-02-26T17:31:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Deedeedee Steven for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Deedeedee Andy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Grow up. Seriously. I haven't been on here in 2 years, and now I'm a sock puppet? Me and Deedeedee Steven made these accounts to vandalize, I admit, but it was a long time ago. I finally get my password right, and now I'm a 'sock puppet' Oh, and I'm still banned? C'mon. What I did wasn't even that big of a deal.

Decline reason:

The only edits from this self-professed vandalism only account were not constructive, and there were half a dozen or so socks in time since this was blocked. I see no reason to presume unblocking you would lead to positive results. Kuru (talk) 00:17, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.