User talk:Decltype/Archive 15
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Decltype. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | → | Archive 20 |
help needed
Hi Decltype, I have written an article named Banaz a Love Story, which is in fact a film. I also uploaded the poster of the film to use as a picture. I have got the permission from the directer of the film Deeyah to use the poster. But I don't know how to get a permission which is to be posted or used here on wikipedia. Can you please, contact her to sort this matter for me. Thanks in advance. Mehmda (talk) 19:30, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Mehmda. Matters may be more complicated than that, because the director does not necessarily hold copyright to the film poster. Only the author of the artwork can release it under a free license (as required by Wikimedia Commons). However, the poster can be used on the English Wikipedia under the non-free content criteria. That is, if you upload a smaller version (no more than 400x400) locally (here), it can be used as an illustration to the film article. I can help you make sure the file is tagged correctly afterwards.
- If you happen to know who created the film poster, I can compose a standardized letter asking for release under a suitable license so it may also be used on other Wikimedia projects. Regards,
decltype
(contact) 10:20, 3 October 2012 (UTC)- This is the reply I got from Deeyah. "Fuuse Films owns the copyright to the film poster. Which is my company". That means Deeyah is the person who is in position to give permission for use of the poster to the article. Can you please contact her. Thanks.Mehmda (talk) 18:10, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- I have received a reply from Deeyah, and updated the image page on Commons. Let me know if you need further assistance. Regards,
decltype
(contact) 19:14, 3 October 2012 (UTC)- Thanks a lot, I would come back next time when I would need more help.Mehmda (talk) 19:23, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- decltype, please can you check, th file is going to be deleted, can you sort it. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Banaz_A_love_Story.jpg Mehmda (talk) 12:05, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot, I would come back next time when I would need more help.Mehmda (talk) 19:23, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- I have received a reply from Deeyah, and updated the image page on Commons. Let me know if you need further assistance. Regards,
- Hi, I guess the permission e-mail has gotten lost somewhere. I will re-forward it. Regards,
decltype
(contact) 16:31, 5 November 2012 (UTC)- Hi Decltype, the file has been deleted, can you please do something. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Banaz_a_Love_Story Regards Mehmda (talk) 14:07, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, I guess the permission e-mail has gotten lost somewhere. I will re-forward it. Regards,
Sorry about that, I will investigate the issue. I suspect that my e-mail somehow got lost in the queue again. decltype
(contact) 01:13, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- Happy New year decltype, have you heard anything about the perission for this file. RegardsMehmda (talk) 22:28, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hello again! I received a confirmation that the e-mail had in fact been received. Due to other commitments I have unfortunately been unable to pursue the issue further. I'll look into it as soon as possible.
decltype
(contact) 08:57, 11 January 2013 (UTC)- This should now be taken care of, sorry for the delay. Regards,
decltype
(contact) 11:47, 28 January 2013 (UTC)- Thanks a lot Decltype.Regards Mehmda (talk) 23:40, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- This should now be taken care of, sorry for the delay. Regards,
- Hello again! I received a confirmation that the e-mail had in fact been received. Due to other commitments I have unfortunately been unable to pursue the issue further. I'll look into it as soon as possible.
A guy needs to be warned if not banned
Hi Decltype, can you check what this guy "Kinahus" is doing with the article about Adil Khan, his edits have been reverted back, but he comes back again to make some mess with the article. Possibly , he has some personal thing against Adil because of Norske Talenter. I can fix the page, but the guy would be back again to mess up. Can you talk to him before I fix the page to its earlier state. Thanks,
Regards Mehmda (talk) 00:04, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- Hi again, thanks for the note. It has now been taken care of.
decltype
(contact) 00:27, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
decyltype is alway there to help, feels so good to know him. Jogibaba (talk) 17:01, 29 May 2013 (UTC) |
Requesting your opinion on a photo
Hi. We really need your opinion on which of these photos would make the best Infobox portrait for the Rick Remender article. Could you please offer your opinion in that discussion? The most recent subsection of that discussion is here, so you can just chime in there if you don't want to read the whole thread. I really appreciate it. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 17:10, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
The article List of players on High Stakes Poker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This article is entirely redundant. Aside from the list of players in the table, the prose adds nothing that isn't already or should just be in the High Stakes Poker article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.--Atlan (talk) 02:58, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
A few requests
Hi,
Can you restore the related talk page for List of players on High Stakes Poker? Thanks! Valoem talk 22:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
Can you restore the full article history and full talk history?
Thanks! Valoem talk 18:06, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Sure, no problem.
decltype
(contact) 18:26, 14 March 2014 (UTC)- Thanks! Valoem talk 19:16, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Can you restore this article, Erica Schoenberg? It looks like it was proded which I am contesting she was notable in her own right with over 800k in earning and multiple poker related appearances. I can clean and update article depending on its condition. Thanks! Valoem talk 05:47, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Also could you restore the following article to my user space with full history intact?
Valoem talk 05:52, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- I restored Erica Schoenberg and userfied Alquimia. Aimo Leikas had no content or history, except for a test page/possible attack page, so I did not restore that one. I agree that Erica Schoenberg is probably notable, a cursory search reveals sources like [1]. Good luck improving the articles. Regards,
decltype
(contact) 13:44, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Hey, I was wondering if you could restore the talk page for that page and also the redirect C+Swiss. I wrote the article prior to being able to add citations because I was editing from an IPhone. I have seen been able to added some additional info. It was a speedy delete which I am contesting. Thanks! Valoem talk 14:13, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- I have restored the pages. In general, when an article is deleted by any other process than PROD, you may want to consult the deleting admin directly. In this case undeletion is uncontroversial, but that may not always be the case. However, feel free to ask here if you are unsure. And keep up your article work :) Regards,
decltype
(contact) 16:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)- Thanks!! :)Valoem talk 00:12, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Curb stomping
Hi again!
I was wondering if you could userify one of the following articles to my space whichever one is the oldest Curb stomp, Curb stomping, or Curb-stomp. I have found numerous sources that this is in fact real and not a neologism from American History X. Valoem talk contrib 03:15, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, I have userfied the two most substantial versions. Keep in mind that the most recent version in each case may not be the most useful one, as they were both deleted multiple times. Moreover, because the article was deleted after a deletion discussion (in both cases), the article best be listed at deletion review before being recreated in article space. Regards,
decltype
(contact) 08:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Valeria Lukyanova
Can you restore the full history for Valeria Lukyanova and the talk page article has passed an AfD. This is for my research purposes. Eventually I intend to debate the validity of WP:BLP1E as it has repeatedly caused issues. Valoem talk contrib 14:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done. Sorry for the delay. Regards,
decltype
(contact) 19:22, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Misc
- Hi again,
Could you unsalt this article Wavedash, I am going to create a redirect. Thanks! Valoem talk contrib 13:57, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done. Regards,
decltype
(contact) 08:14, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! Also :) can you delete these userfied articles they are creating search links from my user name: User:Valoem/Tony Luke's, User:Valoem/CSwiss, User:Valoem/No call, no show, and User:Valoem/Hoagie Haven. :) Valoem talk contrib 14:14, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done. You could also simply tag the pages with {{db-userreq}} or {{db-self}}, and they will be deleted quickly by any administrator patrolling CAT:CSD. Regards,
decltype
(contact) 16:11, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, can you userfy a few more articles and their talk pages for me?
- Boom PSX N64 USB Adapter
- Movie Game
- Snap inhale
- Nemu64 (just the talk page to User talk:Valoem/Nemu64) Valoem talk contrib 15:36, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- I have restored the pages above. I didn't see much useful content in the talk pages, but I can of course restore them when the pages are eventually moved back to the main space. Regards,
decltype
(contact) 15:58, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- I have restored the pages above. I didn't see much useful content in the talk pages, but I can of course restore them when the pages are eventually moved back to the main space. Regards,
Hi again, I've rewritten this article with citations can you please restore the full history and talk page and also for Vajazzling as well. Valoem talk contrib 07:00, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Help needed
Hi decltype, I have uploaded a logo here http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Fuuse_Official_Logo.jpg , I am not sure if i have done it right, can you please check with Deeyah, for all those technicalities. I asked her if I am allowed to use the logo on the related article and this was ok by here. Can you plase help. Regards--Jogibaba (talk) 17:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hello again, sorry for the very delayed response. Because the logo only consists of text, it isn't protected by copyright. That means that from a copyright perspective, the logo can be freely used in any Wikipedia page. I have modified the description to reflect this. Regards,
decltype
(contact) 11:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC)- Thanks a lot Decltype, you are always there when I need help. Is this image free to use on other wiki sections like Norwegian wiki etc. Regards--Jogibaba (talk) 23:57, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- Today there is a notice to move the file to Common, I don't want to make mess, so I did not touch it, I hope you can sort that http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Fuuse_Official_Logo.jpg . Regards --Jogibaba (talk) 16:07, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, yes the file can be used on other wikis as well, and I see no particular reason why it couldn't be moved to Commons if you intend to use the file on other projects. Regards,
decltype
(contact) 09:57, 4 June 2013 (UTC)- Hi, I have tried this file on other wiki projects and it does not work anywhere other than English Wiki, because this is not moved in common. I think you havn't checked this notice put on file's page " Notice: This file was flagged by a bot (User:ContinuityBot) for transfer, so also remember to check if file is usable before moving it to Commons. I don't know how to move the file to common, can you please do that.Regards--Jogibaba (talk) 14:40, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, yes the file can be used on other wikis as well, and I see no particular reason why it couldn't be moved to Commons if you intend to use the file on other projects. Regards,
- Today there is a notice to move the file to Common, I don't want to make mess, so I did not touch it, I hope you can sort that http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Fuuse_Official_Logo.jpg . Regards --Jogibaba (talk) 16:07, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot Decltype, you are always there when I need help. Is this image free to use on other wiki sections like Norwegian wiki etc. Regards--Jogibaba (talk) 23:57, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Done the logo should now be usable on all projects (Using [[File:Fuuse-logo.png]]). Regards, decltype
(contact) 10:03, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
(Mmkstarr (talk) 23:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)) Explanation: It's a bug. It's a computer virus. Get the fuck rid of it. Some wind from Iceland literally acoustovibrationally hacked into some server and the nets isn't shuffling itself for the users indulging this area.
Problem with Spanish Wikipedia
Hi decltype, I have a huge problem and I hoped you can help me. Here's the deal, I have an account on the Spanish Wikipedia that's blocked, but for unfair reason.
I have access to internet conection by using an USB Modem, and a few months ago this device would access to various accounts and another people's IP addresses, and people could use my IP address too. An account called NebrazkaBIEBER (you can access to this link and see she's clearly blocked also in the Spanish Wikipedia) used my IP address and got me blocked by the user Taichi who I can't write to tell her my problem because I'm blocked, and my internet modem doesn't work to give me internet conection now and oddly I only can use Wikipedia.
I hope you can help me please to contact somebody of the Spanish Wikipedia, I don't know who else can give me a hand. And also needed to say that I am a good contribution to the English Wikipedia and I have been using it for a year and I haven't had any problems. If it's not much trouble I will email this to you aswell. Karlitatv (talk) 18:41, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hi,
- Sorry to hear you are blocked on Spanish Wikipedia. Unfortunately, I am unable to review your case as my Spanish language skills are limited. Your explanation is a bit unclear about your circumstances. What is the message you get from the interface when you try to edit on Spanish Wikipedia? Perhaps you have been caught in an es:Wikipedia:Bloqueo automatic? In that case, you should use the {{desbloqueo}} template on your talk page there to have the block lifted. From es:WP:BLOCK:
“ | De vez en cuando, los usuarios con IP dinámicas pueden encontrarse con un bloqueo accidental, debido a que su IP actual fue utilizada por un usuario registrado o anónimo ya bloqueado. Estos bloqueos desaparecen si se puede forzar el cambio de IP (por ejemplo, reiniciando el router o módem ). Si no es posible, se puede informar a un bibliotecario colocando la plantilla de {{ desbloqueo }} en la discusión de la IP e indicando el número que aparece luego del símbolo # en el formulario de bloqueo | ” |
- Make sure you include the block ID in your request. Let me know if you need further assistance.
decltype
(contact) 06:35, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Why balls bounce? listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Why balls bounce?. Since you had some involvement with the Why balls bounce? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 19:10, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection
Hello, Decltype. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
- Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
- A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
A new user right for New Page Patrollers
Hi Decltype.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Decltype. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
- NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
- Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13
- A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
- Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
- Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.
- When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
- Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
- The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.
- The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.
- JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2017).
- Amortias • Deckiller • BU Rob13
- Ronnotel • Islander • Chamal N • Isomorphic • Keeper76 • Lord Voldemort • Shereth • Bdesham • Pjacobi
- A recent RfC has redefined how articles on schools are evaluated at AfD. Specifically, secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist.
- AfDs that receive little participation should now be closed like an expired proposed deletion, following a deletion process RfC.
- Defender, HakanIST, Matiia and Sjoerddebruin are our newest stewards, following the 2017 steward elections.
- The 2017 appointees for the Ombudsman commission are Góngora, Krd, Lankiveil, Richwales and Vogone. They will serve for approximately 1 year.
- A recent query shows that only 16% of administrators on the English Wikipedia have enabled two-factor authentication. If you haven't already enabled it please consider doing so.
- Cookie blocks should be deployed to the English Wikipedia soon. This will extend the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user after they switch accounts under a new IP.
- A bot will now automatically place a protection template on protected pages when admins forget to do so.
Administrators' newsletter – April 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2017).
- TheDJ
- Xnuala • CJ • Oldelpaso • Berean Hunter • Jimbo Wales • Andrew c • Karanacs • Modemac • Scott
- Following a discussion on the backlog of unpatrolled files, consensus was found to create a new user right for autopatrolling file uploads. Implementation progress can be tracked on Phabricator.
- The BLPPROD grandfather clause, which stated that unreferenced biographies of living persons were only eligible for proposed deletion if they were created after March 18, 2010, has been removed following an RfC.
- An RfC has closed with consensus to allow proposed deletion of files. The implementation process is ongoing.
- After an unsuccessful proposal to automatically grant IP block exemption, consensus was found to relax the criteria for granting the user right from needing it to wanting it.
- After a recent RfC, moved pages will soon be featured in a queue similar to Special:NewPagesFeed and require patrolling. Moves by administrators, page movers, and autopatrolled editors will be automatically marked as patrolled.
- Cookie blocks have been deployed. This extends the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user if they switch accounts, even under a new IP.
Administrators' newsletter – May 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2017).
- Karanacs • Berean Hunter • GoldenRing • Dlohcierekim
- Gdr • Tyrenius • JYolkowski • Longhair • Master Thief Garrett • Aaron Brenneman • Laser brain • JzG • Dragons flight
- An RfC has clarified that user categories should be emptied upon deletion, but redlinked user categories should not be removed if re-added by the user.
- Discussions are ongoing regarding proposed changes to the COI policy. Changes so far have included clarification that adding a link on a Wikipedia forum to a job posting is not a violation of the harassment policy.
- You can now see a list of all autoblocks at Special:AutoblockList.
- There is a new tool for adding archives to dead links. Administrators are able to restrict other user's ability to use the tool, and have additional permissions when changing URL and domain data.
- Administrators, bureaucrats and stewards can now set an expiry date when granting user rights. (discuss, permalink)
- Following an RfC, the editing restrictions page is now split into a list of active restrictions and an archive of those that are old or on inactive accounts. Make sure to check both pages if searching for a restriction.
Administrators' newsletter – June 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2017).
- Doug Bell • Dennis Brown • Clpo13 • ONUnicorn
- ThaddeusB • Yandman • Bjarki S • OldakQuill • Shyam • Jondel • Worm That Turned
- An RfC proposing an off-wiki LTA database has been closed. The proposal was broadly supported, with further discussion required regarding what to do with the existing LTA database and defining access requirements. Such a tool/database formed part of the Community health initiative's successful grant proposal.
- Some clarifications have been made to the community banning and unblocking policies that effectively sync them with current practice. Specifically, the community has reached a consensus that when blocking a user at WP:AN or WP:ANI, it is considered a "community sanction", and administrators cannot unblock unilaterally if the user has not successfully appealed the sanction to the community.
- An RfC regarding the bot policy has closed with changes to the section describing restrictions on cosmetic changes.
- Users will soon be able to blacklist specific users from sending them notifications.
- Following the 2017 elections, the new members of the Board of Trustees include Raystorm, Pundit and Doc James. They will serve three-year terms.
Hello
Hello!
Did you make lands of Titan (teams)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.91.144.174 (talk) 14:18, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- No, sorry. Is this Wikipedia-related?
decltype
(contact) 07:06, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).
- The RFC discussion regarding WP:OUTING and WMF essay about paid editing and outing (see more at the ArbCom noticeboard archives) is now archived. Milieus #3 and #4 received support; so did concrete proposal #1.
- Fuzzy search will soon be added to Special:Undelete, allowing administrators to search for deleted page titles with results similar to the search query. You can test this by adding
?fuzzy=1
to the URL, as with Special:Undelete?fuzzy=1. Currently the search only finds pages that exactly match the search term. - A new bot will automatically revision delete unused file versions from files in Category:Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old.
- Fuzzy search will soon be added to Special:Undelete, allowing administrators to search for deleted page titles with results similar to the search query. You can test this by adding
- A newly revamped database report can help identify users who may be eligible to be autopatrolled.
- A potentially compromised account from 2001–2002 attempted to request resysop. Please practice appropriate account security by using a unique password for Wikipedia, and consider enabling two-factor authentication. Currently around 17% of admins have enabled 2FA, up from 16% in February 2017.
- Did you know: On 29 June 2017, there were 1,261 administrators on the English Wikipedia – the exact number of administrators as there were ten years ago on 29 June 2007. Since that time, the English Wikipedia has grown from 1.85 million articles to over 5.43 million.