User talk:Declan Martin

Declan Martin, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Declan Martin! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:30, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Álvaro Blanco

The article Álvaro Blanco has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 20:39, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Johan Jamaza

The article Johan Jamaza has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 20:39, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Suhel Suhabarat

The article Suhel Suhabarat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looks like a hoax to me. Seems to have scored an awful lot of goals for Johor, but was mysteriously not featured in their article until this article was created. Has since been removed from their squad listing as well. the reference provided is simply a google search for people with that name, which doesn't bring up anyone who is a footballer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 10:15, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of CD Bilbao

The article CD Bilbao has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looks like a hoax to me, can't see any reference to a team of this name any where, the reference provided has nothing to do with the club, I don't see any evidence of their existence in the WP articles for the leagues in which they are supposed to have played, the stadium listed is not their ground and none of the players linked actually go to articles about footballers playing for this club. Everything about this article smells fishy, but I don't know enough about low level Spanish football to say for sure.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 10:55, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Do not create, add, maintain, insert, or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, such as you did with the article Johan Jamaza. Usually, hoaxes will be caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Please don't create such obviously fake articles and please do not vandalise pages so blatantly as you did here. If you create any more hoax articles or vandalise any other articles, you will be blocked from editing. Fenix down (talk) 12:23, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Articles

You may wish to comment on the discussion here. Fenix down (talk) 12:34, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to create hoax articles, you will be blocked. Giant Snowman 20:39, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks can easily be misinterpreted. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. This is not an appropriate edit summary. Please assume good faith Joseph2302 (talk) 16:46, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Goal celebration, you may be blocked from editing. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 17:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Álvaro Blanco

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Álvaro Blanco, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 17:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Álvaro Blanco, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 18:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at United Soccer League. —teb728 t c 20:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Kennedy SC

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as John Kennedy SC, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —teb728 t c 20:29, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creating hoaxes. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:11, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!