User talk:Decepticon Shockwave

This is Decepticon Shockwave's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Misclick

It was a misclick, and Huggle is refusing to undo it. Busy trying to repair the damage I have caused now. Apologies. Elemesh^Talk 20:03, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It confused the hell out of me. --Decepticon Shockwave, signing off. (talk) (contributions) 20:04, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool moniker

Shockwave has the most distinctive face in the 1984-87 cartoon series. GoodDay (talk) 19:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, he's one of my favourite Transformers characters. He's right up there with Megatron, Soundwave, Starscream, Skywarp, Laserbeak, Ravage, Blackout and everyone in Shattered Glass. --Decepticon Shockwave, signing off. (talk) (contributions) 19:57, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He's no pal of Blaster's for sure. GoodDay (talk) 20:00, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really like Blaster. Then again, I don't like any Autobots.

(MAYBE except Magnus, Warpath and the Wreckers.....MAYBE.) --Decepticon Shockwave, signing off. (talk) (contributions) 20:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The return of the sock

So, guess who's back! The one of twenty-five! And guess what? Now I'm going for something more fun than annoying Thejadefalcon and his sock ring: page move vandalism! --Shadowbringer (talk) 09:05, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please block him. He keeps moving pages to weird titles. Japheth the Warlock (talk) 09:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can't do that because I'm not an admin. But someone blocked him. --Decepticon Shockwave, signing off. (talk) (contributions) 09:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 17:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In case you want to request unblock, you were discussed on J.delanoy's page, here. --Thejadefalcon ^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 18:32, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Decepticon Shockwave (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I take an interest in a vandal because I get hit by a rangeblock set up against him. I know lots of stuff about Wikipedia. I edit off the same IP range. This supposedly makes me a sockpuppet. XXV registered after me, so that would technically make me the sockmaster. At the very least, the sockpuppet tag should be a suspected sockpuppet tag. And anyway, J.delanoy has said that he may be mistaken.

Decline reason:

Perhaps you've explained this elsewhere, but, the problem isn't just that you edit off the "same IP range". The problem is at the very least edits such as this followed in quick succession, within a minute, on the same IP, by this. Or, for that matter, this followed by this, in the same fashion. Either you're playing musical chairs with a vandal or you're attempting a good hand/bad hand operation; regardless, this won't be allowed to continue. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Err... (raises hand) I hate to point this out, but XXV has previously stated that he owns a

legitimate, non-vandalising account on Wikipedia. --Thejadefalcon ^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 18:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you very much, I know that. But if you read XXV's SPI, you'd know that 94.109.0.0/16 is a very busy range. A /16 includes 65536 IPs. I'm one user out of God knows how many using that range. Needle in a haystack. --Decepticon Shockwave, signing off. (talk) (contributions) 18:58, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was just saying that the whole "XXV registered after me, so that would technically make me the sockmaster" probably wasn't helping your case. --Thejadefalcon ^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 19:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was merely pointing out how wrong this whole accusation is. Accusing someone who's been here since October of being a sock of a vandal who appeared in November is like someone claiming to have seen someone else jumping over the Empire State Building while sitting in a wheelchair. --Decepticon Shockwave, signing off. (talk) (contributions) 19:13, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I want to believe you. I really do. But I have some doubts. I hope that I'm wrong though and you are not XXV. Look. If you realy are XXV then you need to stop harassing me among other editors. Now if you aren't then you'll have to prove it in some way. Once again I hope im wrong. Thanks--Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 19:21, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see how else I can prove it, other than being actively involved in hunting down his socks, as well as proposing his community ban, which I've already done. Unless you can tell me how else I could prove it, I've got no idea. --Decepticon Shockwave, signing off. (talk) (contributions) 19:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You could explain why you are editing from the same IP addresses as his socks do at the same time his socks do. On multiple occasions. On a very very dynamic connection. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look just face it. Most of us think that your XXV. Unless you can actually prove that your not then I cant really help you. Sorry.--Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 19:55, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just have a random question. Why was there an off-the-record CU performed? Was it to check for more XXV sleepers? --Decepticon Shockwave, signing off. (talk) (contributions) 07:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? Is anyone here actually paying attention? Because I'm asking a valid question.

Also, thought you should know that now that I've reached the titles of "banned user on EN" and "known sockpuppeteer", I'm going for "cross-wiki vandal". --Decepticon Shockwave, signing off. (talk) (contributions) 11:46, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As much as I appreciate your admission, you were rather late to the party. Talk page access disabled. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:16, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

← (raises eyebrow) So you're admitting you're Editor XXV? --Thejadefalcon ^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 16:11, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]