User talk:Dean Wormer/Archives/2007/September
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Dean Wormer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Belle Valley Ohio
Thanks for fixing those links, and I did not lose any changes, may I ask a ?, am I allowed to post up a coming soon website for Belle Valley Ohio on there? This is just going to be a informational 100% ad free site. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.253.16.131 (talk) 03:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- If it's "coming soon", it's probably best to wait until it goes live. - Dean Wormer 03:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Who are you?
Who are you? Did you know Shawn Lane? Why are you deleting my contributions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Southerntemper (talk • contribs) 23:50, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't delete anything. I warned you for the personal attack and threat that you made, which I saw while monitoring recent changes. - Dean Wormer 23:54, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Corandi
Excuse me why did you delete the Corandi page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by BrendanEamer (talk • contribs) 04:22, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't delete it. I tagged it for deletion. An admin would have deleted it. - Dean Wormer 04:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- why? What wasn't kosher about it?
- Was this the one with the photo of a couple kissing? It did not assert any notablilty, did not cite any sources, appeared to be a vanity page, should I go on? Apparently, the deleting admin agreed. Dean Wormer 04:31, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- How does one assert notability?
- See Wikipedia:Notability, and also WP:NOT. - Dean Wormer 05:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- How does one assert notability?
- Was this the one with the photo of a couple kissing? It did not assert any notablilty, did not cite any sources, appeared to be a vanity page, should I go on? Apparently, the deleting admin agreed. Dean Wormer 04:31, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Read before reverting
That was not vandalism, Should I outline the definition? I was adding a relevant, sourced, perfectly appropriate link to the bottom of all the other links. Why should this relevant article not be included with all the other relevant articles? 68.143.88.2 18:57, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, the view I was using when I made the revert did not have the "good faith" button visible (using Twinkle). You do need to have consensus for that addition, however, since it is a core policy. - Dean Wormer 18:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- I'll revert myself then. I was unaware of the core policy policy :) 68.143.88.2 19:00, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
User:Fosho3011
Did you report the vandalism to the PHS page? If not, I will report.IrishLass0128 13:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- That user went inactive after my warning. I would give him one more final warning before reporting. - Dean Wormer 01:05, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
User:Jeeny and ANI
I see that this page says I should notify her of this report, should I do that even though her user page has been deleted and her user talk page has a "RETIRED" tag on it? Reply on my page, please. - Rjd0060 02:39, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- I know people have reported her to ANI before, and she got upset that she wasn't notified. I guess I will let her know. Thanks - Rjd0060 02:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- That sounds like a good call. Dean Wormer 02:47, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- I think I did it politely. See User Talk:Jeeny#Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Discussion. - Rjd0060 02:49, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- That sounds like a good call. Dean Wormer 02:47, 30 September 2007 (UTC)