User talk:DeBerryTexas
August 2015
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.Wether you like it or not, her death can be listed on the page. Although it is a tragedy, and i am sorry for your loss. Luis Santos24 (talk) 17:47, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Luis Santos24. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I said it was tragic and i am sorry for your loss. I do not edit Wikipedia to engage myself in petty arguments. Please watch your tone, you have been reported for being rude, because my patience is thin, if you do not like Wikipedia, why make an account? Luis Santos24 (talk) 23:32, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. NeilN talk to me 23:48, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Note you will be unblocked after you explicitly retract the threat of taking legal action. --NeilN talk to me 23:53, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
- DeBerryTexas, if you have a look at the relevant policy, WP:NLT, you'll see why the block was issued, for the remark "The matter is being turned over to our attorney". We take these statements, which are interpreted as threats, very seriously, though as a result the response may sometimes see like overkill. In the meantime, if you have a look at the article, you'll see that the content you objected to was removed--if that other editor hadn't beaten me to it, I would have done it myself.
So how did it come about? I guess a very quick escalation--you responded quite forcefully to the editor who reverted you, and that editor in turn responded even more forcefully to you. (For the record, again, your edit to that article was just fine with me, and apparently with others as well.) Now, I doubt that attorneys are really going to get involved with this, and retracting the legal threat is all you have to do to get unblocked, as far as I'm concerned. At the same time, maybe you don't care now that the content is gone--still, if it ever gets reinserted, you can act on it, at least if you're unblocked. Take it easy, Drmies (talk) 03:31, 5 August 2015 (UTC)