User talk:Ddstretch/Sandbox10
My edits of relevance to the Ayn Rand arbitration of January 2009
[edit](Some minor copy-edits have been omitted.)
- e01: Full page protection notice 31 December 2008
- e02: Advice 3 January 2009
- e03: Comment about withdrawal 3 January 2009
- e04: General warning about behaviour 5 January 2009
- e05: Information about Idag and Kjaer block 5 January 2009
- e06: Minor spacing edits 5 January 2009
- e07: Comment on suggested addition, making point that more evidence of agreement to include it would be good if it is to be included 5 January 2009
- e08: Comment about using article on Che Guevarra as a guide 7 January 2009
- e09: Second Protection notice with advice to Kjaer AND to everyone else, including the "anti-Rand" editors 8 January 2009
- e10: Response to point by Peter Damian 8 January 2009
- e11: Clarification copy-edit of previous message 8 January 2009
- e12: Review announced after criticism that I was giving undue weight to Kjaer and SteveWolfer's disagreement 8 January 2009
- e13: Unblocked with apology and advice 8 January 2009
- e14: Call for improved referencing 8 January 2009
- e15: Difference between a ban and a block and a refusal to indef block "pro Rand" editors 8 January 2009
- e16: Minor spelling copy edit 8 January 2009
- e17: Information post about Ayn Rand from Routledge Encyclopaedia 8 January 2009
- e18: Viewpoint about status of Ayn Rand 8 January 2009
- e19: Observation about Anthony Quinton 8 January 2009
- e20: Comment about Iris Murdoch 8 January 2009
- e21, dds22: Copy edit and clarification (2 additions in a morass of edit conflicts, etc 8 January 2009
- e23: Agreement with comment by a passing editor 8 January 2009
- e24: Comment about mockery of other editors' approaches made by Ethan a dawe and ChildOfMidnight 8 January 2009
- e25: Response to Ethan a dawe and generalised comment to everyone about behaviour 8 January 2009
- e26: Advice to Kjaer about a direct comment by him, plus a direct statement that I am too involved to take any administrative action any more 9 January 2009
- e27: Comment about evidence and weighing different evidence up 9 January 2009
- e28: Observation about need for mediation and about closing the RfC 12 January 2009
- e29: Critical comment about the RfC as it was implemented by Kjaer 12 January 2009
- e30: Response to a retort to me from Kjaer and notice of a call for help to AN/I (which, sadly, was not forthcoming) 12 January 2009
- e31: Willingness at that stage to continue to be involved 12 January 2009
- e32: Response to Kjaer's statement that he will not agree to mediation so long as I and another editor are part of it 12 January 2009
- e33: Response to SteveWolfer's allegation that the blocks I imposed were "questionable" supplying diffs in which I asked for administrator review and the response 12 January 2009
(3 edits that merely archived part of the talk page as it was too long omitted)
- e37: Response to accusation by Kjaer of bad faith on the part of others about mediation request 12 January 2009
- e38: Point of information message about The Flat Earth Society 13 January 2009
Message on a user page of relevance:
- opi1: the key message that some people say shows that I was somehow not neutral in my administrative actions 3 January 2009
Calls for assistance, etc:
- call1: Update to call for review of my block of Kjaer and Idag (initial message included just prior to highlighted diff 5 January 2009
- call2: 12 January 2009 on AN/I
- call3: Notice to User:SlimVirgin to remove me from mediation and arbitration involvement 16 January 2009.