User talk:Ddnile

Welcome!

Hello, Ddnile, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Don't forget to edit your userpage and tell us a bit about yourself...

Happy editing! — Scientizzle

Notable Potential Candidates, 2008 Presidential Election

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Notable Potential Candidates, 2008 Presidential Election, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Wildthing61476 21:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Providence, Rhode Island

If you are going to add a reference to Providence, Rhode Island, please add all the necessary info, including publisher and accessdate, as an extensive amount of effort has been made to standardize the references in this article. Thanks.--Loodog 12:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Magnet award.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Magnet award.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:00, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Magnet award.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Magnet award.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:31, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Snug Harbor Cultural Center

do you have a minute to come back and help figure out how to handle this article?Elan26 (talk) 21:12, 15 July 2008 (UTC)Elan26[reply]

Sources

You might be interested in reading WP:MEDRS, a guide to choosing appropriate sources for medicine-related articles. In general, a hospital website is considered a weak source for scientific or medical facts (better perhaps than nothing, but not very strong). It would be best, when possible, to use strong sources, such as medical textbooks (some are available at books.google.com) or scientific reviews (many are available through pubmed.gov). WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:58, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with WhatamIdoing, and will point out to you again the need to choose more appropriate sources. However well written and accredited, information pages from hospital websites or HMOs, or even pages at the NIH, are tertiary sources. On Wikipedia the medical community gives primacy to high-quality secondary sources, preferably from high impact peer reviewed journals.

Before making any further edits along these lines, please respond to this message with any further queries you might have about the policy. JFW | T@lk 20:22, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Twin Towers 2

As a contributor to this article, you may be interested to know it has been nominated for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twin Towers 2. Robofish (talk) 14:28, 24 June 2010 (UTC) Just FYI, I never contributed to this article. richardw 01:38, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ddnile. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Poetry Society of New York has been accepted

The Poetry Society of New York, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 02:58, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Poetry Society of New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

How to Request an undeletion of a valid image.

Please help me with... The page in question is "The Poetry Society of New York." I want to request an undelete. There is no copyright. The people who founded The Poetry Society of New York gave me written permission to use it because there was no legal claim to it an it can be used by the public. Please advise?

richardw 16:26, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

The image was uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons; if you want to contest the deletion, you will need to do so over there. That said, if "there is no copyright", we'd need evidence to that effect. I rather doubt the logo of an organization established in 2015 was first published before 1923; thus we would need to see evindence that the copyright holder released it into the public domain or under a free license that allows everybody to re-use and modify the logo for any purpose, including commercial purposes. Going by the deleting admin's comment, there was a claim that it wasn't copyrighted because it was too simple to meet the threshold of originality; the admin disagreed with that claim, and after checking the Society's website (presumably it was the book-to-bird logo?) so do I. WP:Requesting copyright permission explains how to demonstrate that the copyright holder has released an image under an appropriate license. Huon (talk) 17:49, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ddnile. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ddnile. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ddnile. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for administrative privileges poll

Regarding the poll you opened, I suggest you have a look at the links in the infobox at the top of the page, the Really simple guide to requests for adminship and the Advice for RfA candidates. At present, those who comment in these polls are interested in evaluating potential candidates with more edits and more participation in administration areas of Wikipedia than you have currently. Also a sustained period of edits over the last six months and preferably a year is generally sought. I suggest that it would be more helpful for you to close your poll and potentially find a friendly editor to give you feedback on your editing. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. isaacl (talk) 07:05, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice.

AfC notification: Draft:Jerry G. Blaivas has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jerry G. Blaivas. Thanks! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 06:21, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying them. -ddnile

Rajveer Purohit

With respect to this article, what is the evidence that he is of any significance in transgender surgery? I see no significantly cited publications in the field., or references to his work in the field

Otherwise: I have followed up you good edits by shortening the long list of citations to the 3 most cited articles by objective data, as is standard practice, and removing a paragraph about minor work.. and removing duplicate and excessive categories. There's more to go.

When there is major material available, it detracts from the significance of notable people to include minor material. WP articles are not intended as complete CVs. DGG ( talk ) 00:13, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the assistance. You have made very helpful modifications and I've learned a thing or two -- much appreciated. Regarding your core question, and as someone who also finds that CVs belong on job boards, not encyclopedic works, the subject was selected by me for these reasons:

He is a director at a prestigious medical university;
He was an early director in training doctors in gender reassignment (today's politically correct term seems to be gender affirmation), and the first at Mt. Sinai;
He was the first person to lecture, as a visiting professor Ethiopia, on gender reassignment -- in other words, in a continent where sexual practices and "deviancy" are still punishable by death;
He is published and peer reviewed;
He is of interest to the transgender community and those who may be searching Wikipedia to find out who the distinguished medical "players" are in the field;
While the book he appears in does sound like a novelty of sorts, it's actually a quite serious topic and led the doctor to establish credibility in the global press; and
With increased curiosity, acceptance, and demand for gender reassignment and related gender studies (that didn't even exist 10 years ago because they were taboo, perhaps), it seems that those who are on the front line of the societal change should be easily accessible.

Well, those are where my thoughts were. Globally recognized, professionally established in a high position, someone who can clain "the first one who..." with regard to several elements.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jerry G. Blaivas has been accepted

Jerry G. Blaivas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 05:44, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Are you paid to edit Wikipedia? Please be aware of WP:COI and WP:PAID. Alexbrn (talk) 18:46, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Response

No. I've been meaning to write a short bio on my page identifying my background, interests and what brings me to Wikipedia. Perhaps I should do that sooner than later if people think I'm a paid agent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.9.249.227 (talk) 18:51, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back! I ask in part because you have uploaded multiple images of people as your "own work" - which suggests (in order to have photographed them) you have some connection to them. So yes, it would be good to clarify. Alexbrn (talk) 18:54, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jorge Coll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 40 under 40 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as René Kahn. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will certainly investigate and correct. I'm not aware of directly importing text (my page development process would make that difficult), but one never knows... so I really appreciate that you brought it to my attention. --richardw 13:28, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Some of the content you added was the same as that in https://www.mirecc.va.gov/visn2/kahn.asp— Diannaa (talk) 13:31, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! When I started editing this page, it was a stub someone left with only only one paragraph, and https://www.mirecc.va.gov/visn2/kahn.asp was one of the sources. I didn't notice any problem and probably made it worse. I will make corrections ASAP. --richardw 13:44, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 19:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ddnile. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 19:49, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ddnile (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

With respect, I want to appeal to blocking my account on the grounds of sockpuppetry, which does not apply to me. My reasoning to request an unblock on my account is comprised of the following points.

As a general note, I never have, in thirteen years or more of editing and improving and policing Wikipedia pages, done anything, consciously, in a malicious manner. To the contrary, I think I have been a good Wikipedia contributor and community member. I have removed from pages what was other people did that was malicious or appeared to be sockpuppetry.

Wikipedia has blocked other accounts suspected of being cohorts of mine (or me). One of the accounts noted is, indeed, another account that I established (I don't think I want to make the username public here, but I will if required). I did not establish this additional account for deception but to ensure that at least one account would be there if someone harassed the other.

I used to have a high-profile position in politics, and that is why harassment is a reasonable thing to have a backup plan for. Note that I have never edited a page about politics, precisely to make sure I didn't violate terms of neutrality.

The other people on the list of suspected puppets are neighbors. I taught them how to use Wikipedia as an editor because they were interested in doing something useful in their spare time. Similarities in style are the result of me having trained them how to do it themselves. For example, if we all use "wordsmithing" in the description of an edit (as indicated in your report), it's because I told them while teaching them the ropes that if they made some tweaks that might improve the writing, "just say it's wordsmithing." I don't think it's uncommon or suspect for a trainee to listen to his or her tutor. If it is unacceptable, then I take full responsibility. They should not be held responsible.

In the charges for sockpuppetry, Mt Sinai hospital came up a something that smelled fishy. It is not fishy. I have never been treated there, nor do I know anyone there other than a nurse (now passed away) who, in 1987, administered chemo to my sister before my sister died. She made my sister laugh. I suppose I work on Mt. Sinai's Wikipedia presence out of respect for that nurse -- but certainly not out of bias. I also have a bit of a medical background (as an editor of translations at the Policlinico of Milan), so it's not peculiar to speak on these topics. Actually, comfort in this area it's not peculiar for anyone who has ever swallowed an aspirin.

If, over my years of contributing to Wikipedia, I acted in a biased manner; if I irresponsibly raised interest among people who wanted to edit and I irresponsibly passed along some advice; if I used one of my accounts to start a debate with the other (whatever that means), then I would wholeheartedly agree with your determination to block me. But I have not been biased, irresponsible or duplicitous. I seem instead to have flipped out an algorithm and gotten some friends in trouble.

I respectfully request your reconsideration. richardw 23:04, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That doesn't fit the evidence from the server logs. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:28, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.