User talk:Dbuga

October 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dbuga (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"Hello, I am not sure why have I been blocked, I have not used other accounts neither has my account been used by other people as far as I know. I believe it may have to do with the Harmony cryptocurrency page that I was working on along with a couple other people. I want to say I am in no way affiliated with Harmony professionally, and I, as well as the other people, were just trying to make an explanation of the Harmony blockchain that could be useful for other people. I stopped participating in the editing after some time due to lack of time, and I understand the reasons that were given to not make the page public, but I believe the blocking of my account is excessive if it is related to that. I hope my account can be unblocked or that I can answer any questions that can help to its unblocking."

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Improper coordinating of editing is called meat-puppetry, and is not allowed. Thank you for discussing that. What would you edit about it unblocked? CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 07:43, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thanks for the resource. If you refer to if I would edit the page I was working on if unbanned, I would not do it again, I think we did not have the right coordination and resources to actually pass the wikipedia requirements. However, recently I was reading some pages more related to my actual work and studies and I noticed a mistake and wanted to make an edit in a page and came back to see if there were any news about my block and saw I hadn't posted the reply properly (I hope I am doing so now)". I have no plans to write any new page, I would just like be able to modify pages if I see a mistake. Hope this helps with lifting my ban.Dbuga (talk) 21:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

working on along with a couple other people.

That's a form of WP:Sock puppetry. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:41, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should not coordinate editing with others off-wiki. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:42, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]