User talk:Dawholetruth
Lester Coleman
[edit]Note for anybody viewing this talk page: this account is very likely owned by the same person who has been inserting information into Lester Coleman that all other involved editors believe is spurious. See Talk:Lester Coleman for more information than you probably want to know. Looie496 (talk) 21:57, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note for anyone viewing this talk page: The "editor" are using inuendo, without any attribution regarding who this editor is. They have nothing but assumptions created by their own obvious aversion for the truth. No "editor" listed above has any professional experience in academic or journalistc research, and cannot footnote any of their claims that, for example, " this account is very likely owned...." Very likley? Based on what evidence?
- Conclusion: This who entry is a creation of the U.S. government spooks and their Pets, doing the bidding of hiding the truth.
- Lester Coleman was Pardoned by President Clinton in 2001. Where is that information in this article? This bunch could not find the Statue of Liberty in New York harbor.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dawholetruth (talk • contribs) 00:33, 10 May 2009
- Nobody has mentioned any reputable source that supports the claim that Coleman was pardoned by Clinton. There are, however, sources to refute the claim. Looie496 (talk) 22:12, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Request for sources on Lester Coleman
[edit]Can you provide any sources or references on Lester Coleman? If so, please provide them to others. Do you have newspaper-clippings, school year books, anything? If you have, please make them available to others. It would be best if you could scan a copy of your material and send it by email to some other editor. At a minimum you should you provide a reference to the printed material when adding information or claims. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 01:58, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- How does one transmit atribution to the site? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dawholetruth (talk • contribs) 00:24, 10 May 2009
- You can mail material to me at petri.krohn (at) iki.fi -- Petri Krohn (talk) 21:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
ANI notification
[edit]Your legal threats are being discussed at WP:ANI#Legal threats at Talk:Lester Coleman. Looie496 (talk) 17:11, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- All of you should read Wikipedia:Don't overlook legal threats. The page in a nutshell:
| “ | When newcomers blank articles or make legal threats, they may have good cause. Stop and look carefully before assuming they're disruptive or wielding a banhammer. | ” |
- I feel that I have looked pretty carefully. And let me point out that a photocopy of a purported passport won't mean anything unless it can be verified, and to the best of my knowledge there is no way for anybody except a government employee to verify the validity of a US passport. Looie496 (talk) 16:10, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Well, for me it will mean something. It may make me believe in you and your claims and make me use my time and effort to promote your cause. I would however be looking for much more proof before I would write anything into article space. Passports would be a good start. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 12:56, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. KillerChihuahua?!? 17:17, 12 May 2009 (UTC)You attempted to evade that block by editing using IP address User:206.223.206.112. Further block evasion will result in blocks on IP ranges and protection of pages from editing as required.
This behavior is unacceptable on Wikipedia. Stop it now. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 19:21, 13 May 2009 (UTC)