User talk:Davron

Copyright

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Atlantic philanthropies article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! --Sherool (talk) 21:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Thank you for experimenting with the page Kansas-Nebraska Act on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Matteo 15:23, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:AkilbaevAmon.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:AkilbaevAmon.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:49, 1 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Iamunknown 03:49, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Altantic logo blu.gif

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Altantic logo blu.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:33, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 16:33, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

A tag has been placed on Image:UzbekStudents.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

No source provided, it is most likely copyrighted material and unlawfully uploded by a user onto Wikipedia. Most of the time self taken images are in larger size, and smaller sized images are usually found on websites.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:UzbekStudents.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Carlosguitar 15:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	Leave evil, it will leave you 18:22, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Amon Akilbaev

The article Amon Akilbaev has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced since 2006

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dweller (talk) 15:38, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nodira

Salom! I noticed you are a native speaker of English as well as fluent in Uzbek. Think you could expand the article on Nodira from the Uzbek version? I asked Abdullais4u if he could translate it a while ago but he hasn't responded. Any addition to the article would be great, many thanks.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:13, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amon Akilbaev

Hello Davron,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Amon Akilbaev for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Vexations (talk) 11:22, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Restoring Amon Akilbaev

Ordinarily, this would not be a problem, but because there were allegations of copyright infringement the article can not be restored until the copyright cleanup unit has a chance to look through the article and independently verify that there is no copyright, or that the there is a point from which the material can be restored prior to the addition of copyrighted material, and in either case both of those are outside my field of specialty. You'll need to leave a message at WP:CCU explaining the whole situation (meaning the article's creation, why it was deleted, and your request for undeletion in that order) so that the CCU people grasp why their being asked to restore the article.

If it turns out that the material is copyrighted then you'll either need to restart the article and refrain from include the material in question, or look into donating the material (which is a field I'm very much unfamiliar with but know people who may be able to help). I know thats not really what you want to here, but if the material is to remain here you're gonna need to use one of these two venues to get it back. If you need anything else lemme know, and I'll do what I can to help. TomStar81 (Talk) 22:26, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]