User talk:Davidvfu1/sandbox

David, I am thinking of expanding on your introduction if you don't mind? Maks kv 91 (talk) 16:00, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded on the introduction. I will put references later on. For now can you guys read it and tell me how it sounds. English is not my native language so there might be errors somewhere. Maks kv 91 (talk) 16:49, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also guys I have recently read about an experiment performed on this theory and I will like to write about that. I have been busy with my Independent Project recently, but I will get this done soon. I promise. Maks kv 91 (talk) 13:37, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are all of the images and illustrations on here made up of copy right free media only? if not they may not be suitable for wiki. The one that includes a photo of the sports car is my biggest concern. Joe1992w (talk) 21:04, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Should we not be trying to improve the existing page rather than starting from scratch? here? Also i'm still concerned about the images being used on here Joe1992w (talk) 16:39, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photoshop

Hi Joe its great to hear from you !! its my image i made it in Photoshop!! from scratch!!! i put the info in the copyright area for the image, I am new to this so its easy to make errors on top i'm sick so anyway.. if you feel you need to edit them or make something new its cool !! or i will be happy to edit that image! if you find out that some issue has come up in regards to that image and copyright just let me know !!!

Existing page

We should be editing the existing page !! and making that page better !!

But we have to use sandbox to do all the editing and test ideas on how we can make the existing page better. So yes i would being info over from the existing page re-build it here part by part then make it live !!

As you can see there are headings, images and i have started on the intro and history,i think all that work would make the existing page better( Just waiting for you guys to give any feed back then i would of started on another part of the existing page re-build it part by part )Davidvfu1 (talk) 17:28, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have put the application of the theory in. I have also put references for my work. I will improve the style of the citation once the article is life. Maks kv 91 (talk) 21:05, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

David, did you move the two paragraphs from the introduction to the main body of the text? Maks kv 91 (talk) 21:06, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys I would just like to let you know that I have send a message on the wikipedia teahouse, to ask if anyone is willing to extend on what we would finish by the end of our coursework. I think this was part of our assessment criteria. Maks kv 91 (talk) 21:27, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Guys, as Joe1992w spotted another group has also been working on the Elaboration Likelihood Model topic, so let's just put all the content we made/wrote and upload just that. What do you say? Maks kv 91 (talk) 16:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree however, some of the content on the original page is of good quality and it isn't in this sandbox. also as somebody else has changed it today we need to mindful not to effect her edits (negatively). I've just added some in-line citations and I am going to continue with this tonight. Joe1992w (talk) 16:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry Joe1992w It turned out to be a false alert. Marina answered our call for assistance on the tea house. She was just trying to help us out a little bit with the article. Apologies for the confusion. Maks kv 91 (talk) 16:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey i added an information graphic i made in Fridays Lecture, Darren told me to upload to the main articles talk page which i did, i wanted to post it onto here too