User talk:Davidvalin

Copyright problems with Fuzzy abduction

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Fuzzy abduction, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=409702. As a copyright violation, Fuzzy abduction appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Fuzzy abduction has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Fuzzy abduction and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Fuzzy abduction with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Fuzzy abduction.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 00:53, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Human organic internet

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 22:27, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Life internet

I have nominated Life internet, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life internet. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 01:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Life internet

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Life internet, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 04:43, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mechanical internet

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Mechanical internet, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 04:43, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

You asked, "How can another person who does not understand the concept request deletion?" The duality "mechanical internet" and "life internet" appears to be a concept of your own creation, and your articles appeared to be your own ruminations on these topics. I came to this conclusion when a Google search found no reference to this pair of concepts; please let me know if I'm mistaken. Wikipedia is not a place for publishing original research. Articles need to be on notable topics backed up by citations of third party reliable sources. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:30, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Forward thinking

The article Forward thinking has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

incomprehensible - and is "forward thinking" even a concept?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lova Falk talk 09:10, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi, and Good day, You deleted my article and concept Forward thinking due to a psychologists recommendation, about a philosophical concept, is it possible to get a copy emailed to me to be able to use in another Open Venue? thanks, and good luck with your venue... 06:16, 21 June 2010 SchuminWeb (talk | contribs) deleted "Forward thinking" ‎ (Expired PROD, concern was: incomprehensible - and is "forward thinking" even a concept?) Davidvalin (talk) 13:46, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Davidvalin

Speedy deletion nomination of Forward Thinking

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Forward Thinking, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 14:36, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Forward Thinking. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Empty Buffer (talk) 14:48, 22 July 2010 (UTC)