User talk:Davidleeroth

License tagging for Image:KISSmorph.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:KISSmorph.gif. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:04, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Davidleeroth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ~MDD 46 96 16:47, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:01-Mania_Velichia(1985).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:01-Mania_Velichia(1985).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Velichia.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Velichia.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Helpme

Please help me get all of my wikiboxes into one nice chart. Also, please help me make the Latin Alphabet box look as nice as the Cyrillic one.

I've just edited your user page, was that how you wanted it? Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 07:07, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's awesome! Could you make the Latin text white?

tagging of Stefan_Guteklint for clean up

Regarding this edit, the rfc template on Wikipedia isn't a request for cleanup, the Wikipedia process is explained here. I reverted your change to the article.

I've also removed the entry from the Requests for Cleanup page on Wiktionary, as the article doesn't exist on that system. --Versageek 21:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:English orthography -- pronunciation of "hour" versus "our"

--------------------------------

Hello Davidleeroth. I noticed your message on the talk page of the English Orthography article. I wrote a response on the talk page of that article. I'll include it here (along with your original message) for your convenience.

Your original message:

I am a native speaker of English, and I pronounce these words VERY differently. In fact, most people I speak with pronounce them differently. I pronounce hour so it rhymes with cower. I pronounce Our like "R" or "are". I think the article was mistaken when it said that hour and our are pronounced the same. I *think* that it meant to say that "our" and "are" are pronounced similarly. I'm sorry for not knowing the IPA alphabet. Davidleeroth 07:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

My response:

To Davidleeroth: I'm American and I see your point. I decided to look a little further into this and this is what I found. Both pronunciations of "our" is acceptable in American English. One pronunciation is the one that rhymes with "are" and the other pronunciation is the one that rhymes with "hour." I've listed these links to Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary for reference: http://m-w.com/dictionary/our and http://m-w.com/dictionary/hour Take care. 61.229.104.25 18:04, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

61.229.104.25 18:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--------------------------------

Speedy deletion of Högt i det blå

A tag has been placed on Högt i det blå requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Quantumobserver (talk) 17:14, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Turið

If you have the source page in dutch, simply create a new section and put the link there. If you do that and expand it, then you can remove the tags. --Riotrocket8676 ^{You gotta problem with that?} 18:55, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You mean Turið and Danish?

Source page is here - http://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turi%C3%B0_Torkilsd%C3%B3ttir That's all there is.

Yeah, Turið. I'm not sure that even the danish page should be there, you should find external sources and make sure that you can back it up. Thanks --Riotrocket8676 ^{You gotta problem with that?} 19:34, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Röda tråden

An article that you have been involved in editing, Röda tråden, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Röda tråden. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. UtherSRG (talk) 01:18, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bajsmannen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bajsmannen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bajsmannen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 15:05, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]