User talk:Davidhartley510

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Davidhartley510, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Brangifer (talk) 05:52, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Homeopathy, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Homeopathy was changed by Davidhartley510 (u) (t) deleting 48768 characters on 2009-12-17T03:31:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:32, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your vandalism has been removed

As noted here, your edit was promptly removed as vandalism. Not only was it vandalism, it violated BLP, NPA (at least one of the named persons is an editor here, and your descriptions of them are libelous), NPOV (which requires that properly documented criticisms be included), removal of references and proper text, addition of a blacklisted URL, adding your own delusional ideas and conspiracy theories, misusing the article as a battleground, adding obvious lies ("The effectiveness of homeopathy has never been in dispute since its inception."), engaging in advocacy of fringe theories, etc.. I'm amazed that you even reported yourself there. I suspect you really shouldn't be here at Wikipedia at all with that attitude. You've been here for a long time, but made few edits. I suggest you study our policies and start following them. I have placed a welcome template above with links for you to study. -- Brangifer (talk) 05:52, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed another violation. You marked your massive vandalism at homeopathy as "minor". It was anything but minor! -- Brangifer (talk) 14:55, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]