User talk:David Humphreys

NOTICE: Your name has been labeled as "BADUSER" on http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:STBotI/BADUSER by Wikipedia. You are adviced to contact Wikipedia email info-en-q@wikimedia.org to demand removal of the entire page or your name only. It is of opinion that this BADUSER page is illegal. Your name appears on internet search results (search text your number is on your number is it a picture or a picture from name) labeling you as a BADUSER. Also, please help by contacting other users listed on this illegal page to notify them of the problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.6.53.48 (talk) 21:25, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Liverpool St Nicholas.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Liverpool St Nicholas.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:07, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Windowbn1950.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Windowbn1950.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:07, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Sleep, Indeed

Quadruple eek; I was wondering why you were saying William Clarke was a disambiguation page. joturn e r 18:06, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Tudor Mint Ltd.

if it reads like an advert im sorry, i just wrote it now and did not mean it to. I will work more on the article in the morning just dont delete it.--Childzy ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 22:31, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy of LinkStation

Unfortunately, advertising is not a criteria for speedy deletion. Please take a moment to review WP:CSD. IceKarma ॐ 02:39, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can:

Try to write a non-advertisement NPOV article;
Take it to WP:PROD;
Take it to WP:AfD.

IceKarma ॐ 02:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baked Apples

Oh come on, whatchya got against my baked apple article? You realize it's a real food? I'll expand it soon. Communist47 09:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baked apple

Please drop by the deletion debate. Perhaps you like the merge suggestion that has been made. :) - Mgm|^(talk) 12:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to User talk:81.179.163.35

When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. - CobaltBlueTony 18:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eeeek !!!! Just realised do you mean {{subst:welcome}} David Humphreys 18:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! :-) - CobaltBlueTony 18:25, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User:64.48.78.6

If he has 4 Strikes against him, yes he is a canadate for blocking. Report him at: WP:AIV. °≈§→ Robomaeyhem: T/←§≈° 20:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baked apple and Derek Wood (author) and LinkStation

Closing AfD's and archiving AfD discussions can only be done by an administrator. I also suggest checking out Wikipedia:Deletion process for more info.--TBCTaLk?!? 21:52, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion vs AfD vs Prod

Hi David!

There's probably some useful things you might like to know about deletion on Wikipedia, as you are currently flooding AfD with dozens of articles best dealt with in other ways.

Wikipedia has three levels of delete process.

For certain articles that are obviously and clearly not for Wikipedia, there's Speedy Deletion. If you look at WP:CSD, you'll find a list of reasons articles can be speedily deleted by an admin. If you're sure an article fits one of those reasons, put one of the db tags on it and it goes into a category that admins can see. It will generally be deleted in a few minutes.
For articles that are obviously and clearly not for Wikipedia but don't fit with one of the Speedy Delete criteria, there's PROD. This is a slow-motion speedy delete that gives others the chance to object, clean the article up or agree. See WP:PROD for details of how to PROD an article.
For everything else, there's the slow, time-consuming and devisive AfD process. Use that if the other two aren't appropriate.

As long as you use good judgement and don't tag articles for a speedy delete that don't fit the criteria, and keep your cool if an author dePRODs an article without giving a reason, you'll find these are much better ways of proceeding.

Hope this helps. ➨ ЯEDVERS 19:49, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Just wanted to make sure you saw my related note on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rocket_Mobile. Thanks, William Pietri 18:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Just a quick note to say I love your signature- especially the "...ABOUT THE BITS I MESSED UP"!

EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 12:02, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfrtunately, I'm also here to leave a note about your signature. It is massively, unnecessarily intrusive, to the point of taking up six lines in the edit box in my browser. I would greatly appreciate it if you could simplify it, to make it less intrusive in discussion. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 01:20, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:David Humphreys.jpg

I recognize that you put substantial creative work into making this image, but I am deleting this image for a number of reasons:

The use of the Nike logo in this context is in the form of parody. While such use is allowed, it is allowed only under terms of fair use. Wikipedia policy prohibits the use of fair use images outside of the main article namespace. Since this image would never be used in the main article namespace, its presence here is not permissible under our policies. Please see Wikipedia:Fair use criteria for further information on this, in particular item #9.
The image of Cristiano Ronaldo as a portion of this image is unsourced and its copyright status is unclear.
The image of the shirtless person as a portion of this image is unsourced and its copyright status is unclear.

While the second and third items are not direct reasons to speedy delete an image, the first reason is. If you can provide a source for items 2 and 3 with a verifiable free use copyright license, and remove the Nike logo from the image, you are welcome to re-upload the image. If you have questions about this, please feel free to ask. Thanks, --Durin 14:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal

Is it your intention to vanalise all of the Liverpool Cat?. You do not seem to know much about cats. The isted buildings in Liverpool section are sub cats og Buildings and structures in Liverpool.--84.9.192.32 09:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My response

posted on 84.9.192.32's talk page :
I haven't added any articles to the Listed buildings in Liverpool category. Also your accusation of me being a vandal is completely unfounded ... please see WP:CIVIL DavidHumphreys^{SPEAK TO ME}ABOUT_{THE THINGS I MESSED UP} 09:16, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No you added them to buildings and structures in Liverpool. Despite them already being in the SubCats for Listed buildings. You do not seem to know how the cat system works and seem dedicated to not bothering to find out. I'd find it far more considerate and civil of you if you didn't ignore the work done by others.--84.9.211.144 10:09, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

posted on 84.9.211.144 's talk page :
The IPs you are using 84.9.192.32 & 84.9.211.144 are in the range of User:Irate who is indefinitely blocked from this site ... I would suggest that you create a user account. DavidHumphreys^{SPEAK TO ME}ABOUT_{THE THINGS I MESSED UP} 10:18, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

using templates

I've been stub-sorting and I noticed a number of things that look like this:

<div class="messagebox cleanup">Some of the information in this {{{1|article or section}}} has '''not been [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verified]]''' and might not be reliable. It should be checked for inaccuracies and modified as needed, '''[[Wikipedia:cite sources|citing sources]]'''.</div>[[Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification]]
<div class="notice metadata" id="stub">''This article is a [[Wikipedia:Stub|stub]]. You can help Wikipedia by <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|action=edit}} expanding it]</span>. ''</div>[[Category:Stubs]]
<div class="messagebox cleanup metadata"> This article belongs in one or more '''[[Wikipedia:Category|categories]]'''. Please [[Wikipedia:Categorization|categorize]] this article to list it with similar topics.</div>[[Category:Category needed|{{PAGENAME}}]]

I checked your contributions and I noticed that you've adding these things to a number of articles. I don't know if you know this, but instead of copying the code for a template, you can just type the template name within curly braces. Using the above as examples, the correct usage would be:

{{verify}}
{{stub}}
{{uncat}}

If you have any more questions, you can look here or here or leave a message on my talk page. Have a great day and happy editing! ~ Amalas rawr ^{=^_^=} 18:13, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You do bring up a good point about using subst: However, there are some things that should be substituted, and some things that shouldn't. WP:SUBST has a great list of what to subst and what not to. I hope that helps. ~ Amalas rawr ^{=^_^=} 13:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: RE: Signature

Sorry, didn't see you'd replied. Shame it appears not everyone likes your signature! EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 22:41, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me about it: one user came to my talk page just to remove an image, which was fair enough as you're not supposed to use fair use images on your user page, but the user just removed it with a blunt edit summary whilst the guidelines allowed for a polite request to remove it. It's people like that who spread Wikihate in my opinion!

To ensure the balance of WikiLove is restored, here's some WikiLove.

EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 22:47, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Explaining Northumbria (et al)

I am dubious as to the necessity of explaining where Northumbria is/was, not least because if it's done once it should be done everywhere, and that is a huge amount of work to little end. It's not simply kings of Northumbria, no doubt the same would need to be done for all Anglo-Saxon kings, and (I am quite sure) early Irish ones, the Pictish ones, the Dál Riata ones (which currently contain the POV and inaccurate "modern western Scotland" as a pointer) and many British and Welsh ones. ("Cadwallon ap Cadfan (died 634[1]) was the King of Gwynedd ..."; "Flann Sinna ... was the king of Mide ..."; and so on). Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:23, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Battrick Cup

I was just wondering if you could give me an outsiders point of view to what context you'd like to see added to Battrick Cup since you were the one who tagged it. If you have gone over Battrick the article should be pretty straightforward. Thanks --JRA WestyQld2 22:03, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Ok, sounds good. I'll get started onto it. JRA WestyQld2 03:27, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merging David L Cook and David Cook

David, thank you for your request to merge these two articles. Unfortunatley we do not know who wrote the first one David Cook (Musician) and it contains a great deal of information to us that is really uncalled for in this venue. If you could please help us to fix this or even get rid of the other article we would appreciate it. We are not Wiki savy so our office is not sure as to how to do these edits without causing more of a problem. Any help would be greatly appreciated. The David L Cook article is a good article, it is the David Cook (Musician) that needs to have something done with it. Thank you, Daylon Ware --IAMAS Corporation 11:28, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Previous Bose Headphones

Thanks for bringing your concerns to me :) The idea behind this article, just like other products listed on Wikipedia is to provide as much information to people as possable. There have been a few of us that have spent a while trying to make this a very complete and acurate article. Do you have any ideas on how to make this article even better? -- UKPhoenix79 10:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bose Headphone Family

I know that you have worked on Bose related pages before and I was hoping that I could get you involved with the discussion here! Thanks -- UKPhoenix79 05:14, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pa-Bocce

Why do you insist on this article being removed. I did not invent the game, I do not know who did or when, but I do know alot of people at my school play and enjoy it. Some of us are planning a tournament amonst the students to raise money for the various charities it supports. I agree it is a poor article and needs work, perhaps you could help me improve it rather than remove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.65.39.243 (talk • contribs) 03:42, 7 August 2006
My response posted on 74.65.39.243's talk page ...

I don't insist that this article is removed, if you check the page history, you will find that it is a different user who added the "proposed deletion" tag. I added the tag that proposes merging into the Bocce article. I have reverted your removal of the "proposed deletion" tag, because simply deleting the tag is not the correct way to do things. DavidHumphreys^{SPEAK TO ME}ABOUT_{THE THINGS I MESSED UP}02:57, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apoligize for my mistake about the deletion tag. And I would like to know why what I did is "not the way to do things." The tag states "You may remove this message if you improve the article, or if you otherwise object to deletion of the article for any reason. To avoid confusion, it helps to explain why you object to the deletion, either in the edit summary or on the talk page." I otherwise object to the deletion and stated why on the talk page. If I am mistaken I am sorry, I am new to Wikipedia and would like to know what I can do to help preserve the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.65.39.243 (talk • contribs) 04:07, 7 August 2006

No problems about the misunderstanding :) The "way to do it" is to improve the article first, in this particular case, it would be to slightly expand the article, (eg, giving examples of where it is played etc etc) and by providing references (eg, links to websites that mention it, or notes of newspaper articles written about it etc) DavidHumphreys^{SPEAK TO ME}ABOUT_{THE THINGS I MESSED UP}03:14, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well the way I understand it, deleted articles cannot be recreated for some time. Is there anyway I can volentaraly remove the article while I conduct research and repost it when I can create a better article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.65.39.243 (talk • contribs)

See this page, it's a good place to start. And David Humphreys, if any user contests a {{prod}}, even the original author, you shouldn't re-insert the prod. Instead, contested prods should be taken to AFD. Isopropyl 04:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

my talk page

Hey David! Thanks for your comments of support! You left them on my user page, though, so I just moved them to my talk page. Thanks again! wikipediatrix 02:58, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Humphreys?

Are you THE Dave Humphreys?

As in the Magic: the Gathering player?

The Ronin 18:01, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:La Valse à Mille Temps.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:La Valse à Mille Temps.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:07, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:When the Wind Blows.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:When the Wind Blows.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 12:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Windowbs1949.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Windowbs1949.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Lupo 12:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to Image:Windowbn1950.jpg. Lupo 12:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Hartley

Do you know more about the original source of this image? Such as when that Portraits of Liverpool Worthies was published? I can't find that anywhere, not even at the British Library. Lupo 19:42, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Windowbs1949.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Windowbs1949.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jeff Dahl 02:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chris Thile Deceiver.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chris Thile Deceiver.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hed Kandi Back To Love.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Hed Kandi Back To Love.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hed Kandi Disco Kandi.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Hed Kandi Disco Kandi.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hed Kandi Winter Chill.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Hed Kandi Winter Chill.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:45 Dip The Acid Lounge.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:45 Dip The Acid Lounge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:All About Chemistry Blue.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:All About Chemistry Blue.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:All About Chemistry Orange.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:All About Chemistry Orange.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:All Live and All of the Night.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:All Live and All of the Night.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:For The Love Of It.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:For The Love Of It.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:I Hear A Symphony Single.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:I Hear A Symphony Single.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sur Les Traces De Black Eskimo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sur Les Traces De Black Eskimo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 11:34, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Subseven the EP.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Subseven the EP.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Red Crow.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Red Crow.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dining Rooms Numero Deux.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Dining Rooms Numero Deux.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Eloy Destination.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eloy Destination.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:45 Dip The Acid Lounge.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:45 Dip The Acid Lounge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:44, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Join us?

Hello there David Humphreys! Following a period of consulation, the Wikipedia:WikiProject Merseyside is now up and running. It is a user group dedicated to improving all content related to Merseyside, including the city of Liverpool.

As you are a member of Category:Wikipedians in Merseyside, I extend this opportunity for you to join our project and get involved. Hope to see you there. :) --Jza84 | Talk 13:58, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Cain's Brewery, Liverpool, UK.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cain's Brewery, Liverpool, UK.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:44, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tilllate

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tilllate, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 01:49, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:417px-Aigburth - Liverpool dot.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:417px-Aigburth - Liverpool dot.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 17:31, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:For The Love Of It.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:For The Love Of It.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Catherine Street Liverpool.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:22, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Liverpool meetup

Hi David. I'm writing to invite you to the 12th Liverpool wikimeet, which is taking place on the 21st June - see meta:Meetup/Liverpool/12 for the full information. If you're in the area, please consider coming along to it. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:25, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, David Humphreys. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, David Humphreys. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, David Humphreys. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Subseven the EP.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Subseven the EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Royal Rock Beagles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wirral. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]