User talk:David "MoonMeander" Tan

Welcome

Hello, David "MoonMeander" Tan, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:45, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mnogoznaal (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mnogoznaal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mnogoznaal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Java Hurricane 08:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, David "MoonMeander" Tan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Java Hurricane 08:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelly Hyman (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kelly Hyman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kelly Hyman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 17:06, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello David "MoonMeander" Tan. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:David "MoonMeander" Tan. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=David "MoonMeander" Tan|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 17:07, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you GSS for the hint! I tried to give the page maximum compliance with Wikipedia rules by cutting it in half. I wasn't aware of the COI rule. I fixed it by specifying the COI information on the page. Thank you. Can I resubmit a request to review Drafts? --David "MoonMeander" Tan (talk) 17:14, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for disclosing your paid editing status. As per WP:Paid you are requested to also provide links on your Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where you advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services. Please do so before making any further edit. GSS ^💬 17:33, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you GSS for the answer. COI is the only problem with the Draft:Kelly Hyman Page page? I spent a few days studying the rules to figure out how to fix it. Can I apply for a re-audit, or can I not?I checked, this page isn't an orphan and has a connection to other pages. Thank you for the answer.--David "MoonMeander" Tan (talk) 17:37, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You first need to provide link(s) on your Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where you advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services to fully comply with the WP:PAID policy. GSS ^💬 17:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David "MoonMeander" Tan, you have not yet responded to my question above. GSS ^💬 18:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- GSS, i saw your answer. I don't know where or how to put it. I'm helping Kelly with Wikipedia from my instagram-account @povnock. This is hell, not rules, I'm confused. I cannot find information like other participants who have a conflict of interest. I would also like to ask if there are any other page problems besides COI? Compare the new version with the old one. Any subtle opinion has been removed, any advertising that praises it has been removed. My regards! --David "MoonMeander" Tan (talk) 19:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you wasn't hired by her through Upwork? GSS ^💬 19:06, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GSS, I'm not professional or permanent, I'm new to Wikipedia copywriting. I got contacted by she manager on Instagram and after this connect, I have e-mail correspondence with shes. I don't want to distort information or exaggerate, I just want to make sure that at least the core information is published.--David "MoonMeander" Tan (talk) 19:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GSS, Do I have to 100% register for upwork? I read, there's a lot of commissions on every deal (about 20%). It is not profitable, can i do paid-contributions without upwork in the future? I declared instagram-account in my profile.

GSS, hi. You rejected the draft due to lack of compliance with Notability and the rules of relevance of biographies (notability people). I will try to explain the significance of this page. WP:ANYBIO, point 1 fully matches the Kelly Hyman draft page. It is also fully confirmed by WP:NACTOR, paragraph 1 and 3. And also WP:AUTHOR, point 3. My regards. --David "MoonMeander" Tan (talk) 21:19, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Having the Upwork advert set to private does not hide its existence (nor its content, as it happens). If your next edit is not made in order to disclose your Upwork profile, as is required by the rules at Wikipedia:Paid-contribution_disclosure#How_to_disclose, you can expect your account here to be blocked shortly afterwards. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:04, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for refusal to disclose your accounts on other sites where you advertise, solicit or obtain paid Wikipedia-editing services, as required by Wikipedia's paid editing disclosure policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:27, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moonfall edit

Hi David,

As the Emmerich movie seems unrelated to the McDevitt book, I've removed the changes made there. I've also renamed that article to Moonfall (McDevitt novel) https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Moonfall_(McDevitt_novel) You may create a separate page for the movie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zanychap (talk • contribs) 13:43, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mnogoznaal

Hello, David "MoonMeander" Tan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mnogoznaal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:15, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]