User talk:DavidRThomason

DavidRThomason, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi DavidRThomason! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

19:13, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Notability

Hi again. Regarding this edit, someone being the author of a book does not make them notable. Sources demonstrating notability need to be independent of the subject. Please see Wikipedia:Notability. If the book has been the subject of secondary coverage in independent sources, such as book reviews, that might be worth citing. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at University of the Incarnate Word, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 20:58, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The sources are reliable, and a Wikipedia entry about this theologian will be added soon. Please stop removing entry.

Again, the sources listed are independent and reliable. This is very unusual. What do you need to be convinced that independent sources really are independent sources?

You appear to be involved in an edit war at University of the Incarnate Word. Persisting with this will result in your account being blocked. Please undo your most recent edit and discuss the issue on the article talk page to give other editors an opportunity to agree or disagree with your proposed changes. Please also read WP:3RR which is particularly relevant here. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:03, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Wikipedia article about the alum will be added soon.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:03, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 22:23, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]