User talk:DavidLeslie

Welcome!

Hello, DavidLeslie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! JFW | T@lk 20:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of established content

You removed material on Parkinson's disease that was well-established. If you think the article does not represent the study results fairly, please take the following steps:

Edit the article to ensure the results are indeed represented correctly.
Explain on the talk page (Talk:Parkinson's disease) why you think the relevant material should be deleted.
Await consensus on the talk page.
When consensus emerges, edit the article according to consensus.

Given that you're new on Wikipedia you may not be aware that a heavily opinionated user has been causing a lot of damage to the Parkinson's article in the past. There is therefore a high level of scrutiny for every edit by novel users to that article. If you want to contribute to Wikipedia please adhere to the basic rules (see policies and guidelines, link above). JFW | T@lk 20:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism to Parkinson's disease

Unfortunately, with the millions of visitors to wikipedia, many have nothing better to do than amuse themselves by vandalising pages. Don't let it get you down! Keep up the good work. Mushin ^talk 16:10, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

===February 2007===--DavidLeslie 19:34, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not undo other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Tintoretto, or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the 3RR. Thank you. Mdwyer 19:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I haven't exceeded the 3RR. It's obvious that you are simply trying to find fault with me, because you were so obvioulsy shown to be at fault yourself. --DavidLeslie 19:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - You edited a single article three times in 24 hours: [1], [2], and [3]. Only two of them were strictly 'reverts' so no, you haven't exceeded 3RR. The warning is just that -- a warning. By the way, did you happen to notice that I support your other edit to that page? We're not all out to get you. We're trying to keep this a nice, civil place. Mdwyer 19:32, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't look like it. --DavidLeslie 19:34, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the actual policy. 3RR doesn't give you a right to make three reverts and you can be blocked for making less. Sarah 03:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're trying to criticise me for things that I haven't even done. You still haven't answered the questions I asked you. --DavidLeslie 13:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NPA block warning.

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked for disruption. Sarah 03:36, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What continuation of personal attacks ??? Justify yourself with time dated evidence. --DavidLeslie 13:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The user has been blocked indef as a confirmed Tojo sock Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/DavidLeslie -- Chris 73 | Talk 16:40, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]