User talk:DavidFRAS

Welcome!

Hello, DavidFRAS, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Jza84 | Talk 21:07, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Jza84. I hope our obviously opposed points of view on the continued existance of the Statutory Counties will not preclude our working together in many other areas. DavidFRAS (talk) 21:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no view on the matter, I merely write according to citation. You should probably be made aware of WP:PLACE (see "Counties of Britain") regarding counties (your view of "statutory counties" - which itself has no statutory definition - is in conflict with our encyclopedia's policy as well as the vast majority of editors). Should you wish to start making amendments to such topics, what I ask of you is to please seek a consensus first at the various policy pages, rather than begin to remove well established, cited claims about the modern county system(s). --Jza84 | Talk 21:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have read some of those policies and the background discussions. Is the agreement of 11 Wikipedians from a pool of 6½ million a consensus? The Statutory Counties as I have mentioned them are defined in the LGA 1888. I have no intention of making any substantive changes to pages until I have absorbed far more background concerning the current editors. This does not mean that I will not attempt to point out, on discussion pages, glaring errors where I encounter them. If the articles were titled "Administrative Units of Local Government" there would be no issue. DavidFRAS (talk) 21:43, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is built on co-operation, and also, crucially, citaion from reliable sources. Can you point to a third party source that calls the county system of England (or the UK) the "Administrative Units of Local Government"; this seems to be a made-up term, something to be avoided here on Wikipedia. --Jza84 | Talk 23:35, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A very brief search provided two within minutes:

"In this paper the search is performed at the level of local authorities, the administrative units of local government, as these deliver a range of services"

Health underachievement and overachievement in English local authorities

Tim Doran, Frances Drever and Margaret Whitehead - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2006 60:686-693

"Each type of local authority—the administrative units of local government below regions—was represented"

Managing the Care Home Closure Process: Care Managers’ Experiences and Views

Jacquetta Williams, Ann Netten and Patricia Ware - British Journal of Social Work 2007 37(5):909-924

The EU definition of Local Administrative Units is also very close to - but not exactly word for word - a match for a description of the areas currently covered by the Wikipedia policy on Counties. DavidFRAS (talk) 23:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Research survey invitation

Greetings DavidFRAS-

My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Oregon, studying digital media and online community. I am posting to invite you to participate in my research study exploring the work of Wikipedia editors who are members of WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. The online survey should take 20 to 25 minutes to complete and can be found here:

https://oregon.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cSHzuwaQovaZ6ss

Your responses will help online communication researchers like me to better understand the collaborations, challenges, and purposeful work of Wikipedia editors like you. In addition, at the end of the survey you will have the opportunity to express your interest in a follow-up online interview with the researcher.

This research project has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Research Committee as well as the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon. For a detailed description of the project, please visit its Meta page. This survey is voluntary, and your confidentiality will be protected. You will have the choice of using your Wikipedia User Name during the research or creating a unique pseudonym. You may skip any question you choose, and you may withdraw at any time. By completing the survey, you are providing consent to participate in the research.

If you have any questions about the study, please contact me via my Talk Page (UOJComm) or via email. My faculty advisor is Dr. Ryan Light. If you have any questions regarding your rights as a research participant, please contact the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Randall Livingstone School of Journalism & Communication University of Oregon UOJComm (talk) 03:51, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dormant status.

This editor's password was lost and the account became dormant in 2009. A new account was created at Astronomy Explained in 2015. Astronomy Explained (talk) 11:31, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]