Jump to content

User talk:DavidCane/Archives/Archive 10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12→Archive 15

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Oxford Circus tube station

Hey there! I've just added some content on the "umbrella" and other works to accommodate the Victoria line. Is that adequate for the article to reach FA? Do you mind helping me to rephrase some sentences as it is too technical for me to rephrase them. Thanks :) VKZYLUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 04:17, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DavidCane. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Down Street tube station

Hi! Really enjoyed your work on this. I recently managed to get down to the station on one of the Transport Museum tours and have some photos up here - I'll probably move some over to Commons shortly but if there are any in particular you think would be useful for the article, please let me know. Andrew Gray (talk) 15:34, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

You have some very interesting pictures there. It would be great if you could upload some of them to commons showing what changes were made for the shelter (such as the hand-painted signs, the damaged ceiling, sinks) and some that show the station's condition now (the view along the tunnel to the platforms and shots of the trains going past).--DavidCane (talk) 16:06, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Done! commons:Category:Down Street tube station. I've put a gallery of half a dozen representative ones in rather than try and work them into the text, but please feel free to do what you wish with them... Andrew Gray (talk) 20:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks Andrew. Looks like an interesting place to visit. I see from your Flickr that you're also been below ground at Aldwych tube station, did you do that on the same tour or a separate trip?--DavidCane (talk) 22:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Separate trip (was back in 2013) but from the same program, the "Hidden London" tours that the Transport Museum run. They're expensive, but worth it if you have an interest, I think. Andrew Gray (talk) 17:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Hello DavidCane: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Class455 (Merry Christmas!) 16:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message
Thanks.--DavidCane (talk) 13:53, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, DavidCane!

Happy New Year!

DavidCane,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Class455 (talk | stand clear of the doors!) 17:41, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.


Take the survey now!


You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Paddington tube station (Bakerloo, Circle and District lines)

On 16 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paddington tube station (Bakerloo, Circle and District lines), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that London Underground stations Paddington and Paddington are about 400 metres (1,300 ft) apart on foot, but over 20 kilometres (12 mi) apart by train? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Paddington tube station (Bakerloo, Circle and District lines)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Paddington tube station (Circle and Hammersmith & City lines)

On 16 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paddington tube station (Circle and Hammersmith & City lines), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that London Underground stations Paddington and Paddington are about 400 metres (1,300 ft) apart on foot, but over 20 kilometres (12 mi) apart by train? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Paddington tube station (Circle and Hammersmith & City lines)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Ineligible prod for Albert Hall tube station

I see that our serial hoaxer has been at it again with their articles for pipe-dream stations. However, one of the articles that you WP:PRODded, Albert Hall tube station, was not eligible because it had been prodded before; see lead of WP:PROD "it ... may only be placed on an article a single time" and WP:PRODNOM item 3 (first bullet) "confirm that the article is eligible for proposed deletion by checking that it has not previously been proposed for deletion".

Accordingly I WP:DEPRODded the article, but this will not prevent you from filing a WP:AFD. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:46, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Red. I'll do that later.--DavidCane (talk) 15:56, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:18, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Template:LUL stations

When you add stations to the template, please also update the documentation so that I don't have to clean up after you. Your coöperation will be appreciated. Useddenim (talk) 13:29, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:32, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Precious four years!

Precious
Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:01, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paddington tube station (Bakerloo, Circle and District lines)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Paddington tube station (Bakerloo, Circle and District lines) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bob1960evens -- Bob1960evens (talk) 16:02, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

London terminals

Just a quick head's up, I've created a mini-project User:Ritchie333/London termini, as having tackled the four former LNER terminii for the Monopoly mini-project, I've been nudged to do all of the other mainline stations as well. I see you've been feverishly working on the Paddington tube articles, so hopefully we're all moving things along in the right direction. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi Ritchie, the monopoly good topic was an inspired effort and I congratulate you on achieving that. I wish you good luck with getting all the mainline terminals up to GA standard. London Paddington was, I think, a GA at one point and I did think about doing something to bring that back to GA to make a mini Good topic with the two tube station articles (if they get through their GA review). Unfortunately, I have very little reference material for mainline services as my interest has mainly been on the history of the tube, so I haven't done anything with it. I can help with bits on the tube for the other stations if you would like.
Are you planning to include former terminals like Holborn Viaduct, Broad Street, Bishopsgate or Bricklayers Arms (which we don't even have a proper article on)?
At the moment, some of the mainline station articles are combined mainline and tube station articles whereas others have separate articles:
Station Combined or Separate
Victoria Combined
Paddington Separate
Marylebone Combined
Euston Separate
St Pancras Separate
King's Cross Separate
Moorgate Combined
Liverpool Street Combined
Fenchurch Street n/a
Cannnon Street Combined
Blackfriars Combined
Charing Cross Separate
London Bridge Combined
Waterloo Separate
The decision is tricky as to which is the correct approach. Personally, I would like to see separate articles wherever appropriate. Of the ones that have combined articles now, I feel that Victoria and Liverpool Street should have separate articles for the tube as they have separate station buildings and entrances that are external to the mainline station. The others with combined articles are all substantially combined stations,so probably need to stay the way they are.--DavidCane (talk) 23:09, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
To be honest, I'm not sure what scope I'd go for, as it really depends on what source material I can get hold of. I definitely want to do Broad Street, as out of all the seriously mainline stations, it's the only one that actually closed, which not even Marylebone managed (and both Charing Cross and Cannon Street have been for the chop at one point in both their histories). Having looked through some books, I think Holborn Viaduct is definitely worth doing as well, though I've got this nagging feeling we could merge it with City Thameslink and get one really good article, as though they aren't geographically in the same place per se, they serve the same traffic and purpose. However, if you're going to include one or two historic termini, that does open suggestions about doing all of them, like Nine Elms.
You can't really get anything at all from online sources, except maybe the odd history snippet from a Google Books preview, and the London Encyclopedia doesn't devote very much attention on the stations at all, certainly not compared to the streets. Alan Jackson's London's Termini seems to be the best of the bunch, being very informative and detailed about all sorts of facts and figures, (contemporary reports show that John Betjeman was annoyed as he was going to do a similar work in London's Historic Railway Stations but got beaten to it) but it only goes up to 1984 - fortunately (at least from an article writing and sourcing point of view) London stations have been mostly starved of investment between then and the internet age starting in the late 90s, so there's not too much needed to fill the gap. There are other various other specialist books based on the various lines, which occasionally dip into the stations, but they tend to inconveniently stop right at the point the company stopped, was bought out, or otherwise changed circumstances.
Liverpool Street was done as part of the Monopoly project, and for the GA review there we decided to keep the integrated tube article. I realise there is a separate history of sorts, as it was originally called Bishopsgate, but because most traffic to the tube station is heading for the mainline, it does make sense to follow the existing convention. I personally would follow the standard guidelines for spinoff articles and only create a breakout tube one if it begins to dominate the mainline article too much, and even then include a basic summary.
Anyway, hope progress on the tube articles goes well - I have seen you cover quite a few new and get them up to GA, so I think we ought to be able to collaborate and share sources one way or another. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paddington tube station (Bakerloo, Circle and District lines)

The article Paddington tube station (Bakerloo, Circle and District lines) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Paddington tube station (Bakerloo, Circle and District lines) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bob1960evens -- Bob1960evens (talk) 09:21, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paddington tube station (Circle and Hammersmith & City lines)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Paddington tube station (Circle and Hammersmith & City lines) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 06:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paddington tube station (Circle and Hammersmith & City lines)

The article Paddington tube station (Circle and Hammersmith & City lines) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Paddington tube station (Circle and Hammersmith & City lines) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 07:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paddington tube station (Circle and Hammersmith & City lines)

The article Paddington tube station (Circle and Hammersmith & City lines) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Paddington tube station (Circle and Hammersmith & City lines) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:02, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paddington tube station (Bakerloo, Circle and District lines)

The article Paddington tube station (Bakerloo, Circle and District lines) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Paddington tube station (Bakerloo, Circle and District lines) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bob1960evens -- Bob1960evens (talk) 16:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DavidCane/Archives/Archive_10&oldid=1142959780"