User talk:Dave Schmedrick

August 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores was changed by Dave Schmedrick (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921914 on 2017-08-11T17:14:34+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:14, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at September 2015 lunar eclipse. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: September 2015 lunar eclipse was changed by Dave Schmedrick (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.902775 on 2017-08-11T17:16:19+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:16, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 216.235.231.28 (talk) 17:17, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dave Schmedrick (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unblock please I promise not to vandalize again and I be a good wikipedian.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:27, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: I understand what I was blocked for. The vandalism is an accident and as i said tht i would be a good wikipedian if the block was lifted.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dave Schmedrick (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I sorry for vandalizin' i promise if you unblock i be more careful in editing wikipedia and wont cause any more damage

Decline reason:

THere's no way those kind of edits are "accidental"; plus you haven't addressed the additional reason for your block: abusing multiple accounts. only (talk) 17:50, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

i did not abuse multiple accounts

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dave Schmedrick (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i sorry for vandalizin' if u unblock i promise i be a good wikipedian and won't cause any more damage. i can assure you you this is the only wikipedia account i have and i never have abused multiple accounts

Decline reason:

The edits you have made say elsewise. There's not a good reason to unblock at this time. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:03, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.