User talk:Daustinc2

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Daustinc2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

September 2015[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may Appealing a block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:

{{unblock|reason=I will not do any more distrupting edits. I will use resources and explain my edits and talk from now on.  ~~~~}}

. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 14:07, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See this for the community discussion. See WP:Communication is required for a bit more info as well. Unless you can explain your edits, they look like stealthy vandalism to me, and the lack of explanation is disruptive. This is your 4th block for WP:DE issues, which is why it is for an indefinite period of time. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 14:11, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Daustinc2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not do any more distrupting edits. I will use resources and explain my edits from now on ~~~~

Decline reason:

I just checked three recent edits of yours. In all three cases you changed article content away from what reliable sources said. You haven't adressed the problems with your past editing at all. Huon (talk) 23:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

First, I want to understand why you are making changes in all these numbers against sources. From here, it looks like stealth vandalism. What were your sources, specifically? Dennis Brown - 2¢ 17:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to post a new unblock request, feel free to do so, but never modify declined unblocked messages please.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock | reason=I have realized that my distruptive editing was careless. The reason why is because my sources were valid but I didn't know how to link sources properly and therefore I ignored it. I do now know how to edit and use sources from different valid websites. I was never trying to vandalize pages, just improve them. ~~~~}}