User talk:DaudRanjha
September 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm AlphaBetaGamma. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Khalid Mahmood Ranjha, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 00:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Khalid Mahmood Ranjha, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 00:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Khalid Mahmood Ranjha, you may be blocked from editing. AntiDionysius (talk) 01:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Your recent edit(s) to Khalid Mahmood Ranjha has been reverted due to the inclusion of original research, which violates Wikipedia's policies. Please refrain from adding original research to articles in the future and ensure that all contributions are supported by reliable sources. This helps ensure the accuracy and reliability of Wikipedia content. Thank you. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit] Hello, DaudRanjha. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Khalid Mahmood Ranjha, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 00:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 16:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.