User talk:Datapharmer

Thanks!

I just wanted to thank you for my very first barnstar! :-D --Zsinj^Talk 08:23, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are of course very welcome! Datapharmer

I just read your User page and saw thet you attend DBCC. I attend ERAU! Jimbo needs to organize a Daytona meet-up, haha. --Zsinj^Talk 16:23, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe... yah. I wouldn't be surprised if there are quite a few of us wikipedians hidden about! Datapharmer 04:14, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spoken Article:

Hi Datapharmer; quite a while ago you asked me about the spoken version of subterranean homesick blues article. I've been very behind on my many projects, so apologies for taking so long to write this, but it is yours if you are still want to record it. In the meantime I'm taking a break from all other activities (including wikipedia) except schoolwork in an effort to regain my sanity.

I recorded a reading. I skipped some parts, but got the good stuff. Check it out. Leotohill (talk) 06:07, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Subterranean Homesick Blues

Yeah, no prob. Heh, I tend to have a (polite) go at people who do a dozen little edits one after the other but there's a happy medium between that and everything in one go, I quite agree. Cheers, Ian Rose 22:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

Century Tower

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of University of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

Meetup

Wikipedia:Meetup/Tampa -- You're invited! Hires an editor (talk) 13:42, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Datapharmer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Suckcess.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Suckcess.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo of Company All-In Removal LLC.svg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about All-In Removal

Hello, Datapharmer,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Cwmhiraeth and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, All-In Removal should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-In Removal .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:16, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrew Eshleman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Eshleman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Eshleman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 11:55, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DBCC

A tag has been placed on DBCC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G14. Not suitable to be turned into a redirect

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:39, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Seven Life Lessons of Chaos

The article Seven Life Lessons of Chaos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only 17 citations on Google Scholar, mostly seemingly incidental. Article does not even attempt to describe contents of the book.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - car chasm (talk) 23:21, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]