User talk:Darthcon

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Darthcon! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:32, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Darthcon, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Darthcon! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

howdy

Hello Darthcon, thanks for adding some new info to Young Justice, it's appreciated. Somebody named DaHuzyBru undid part of your changes, because there was a syntax-error which made the box look lopsided (missing equals sign and unmatched curly or something like that). I opened up a talkpage section about the stuff, over here. Talk:Young_Justice_(TV_series)#alt_name.2C_related_shows..._are_the_factual.3F

Now, it's totally not necessary for you to learn infobox-wiki-markup-stuff, I should say right up front. You can absolutely still add things without knowing such gory details of course — there are plenty of wikiGnomes like me around to correct such minor things. But in this case, I went ahead and made a talkpage-section, in case you *want* to learn the nitty gritty stuff, or in case DaHuzyBru had some objection besides syntax.

Anyhoo, welcome to the wikiverse; you can leave a note over at the article-talkpage if you feel like it (follow the link above then click the little blue 'edit' next to the subsection-title), or you can leave a message for me if you ever need anything... click 'talk' next to my name, then click 'new section', leave your message and hit 'save'. Of course, WP:TEAHOUSE is faster than me. :-) Thanks for improving wikipedia, see you around. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 16:49, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Sam & Cat because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diffs: 3 edits Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:23, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sam & Cat. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:12, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Disney XD. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Digifan23 (talk) 02:47, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Drake & Josh. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:03, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Gibby. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Do not overwrite existing articles NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:10, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gibby, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:14, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Drake & Josh, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:16, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:16, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It might be a good idea to just block him from editing. I had to revert his vandalism on several other pages. -- »»»DavidTwo2012««« 19:23, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]