User talk:Darkwikihorse

October 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Samur River, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. - LouisAragon (talk) 09:00, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

...our policies and guidelines...

Who are you? Spokesman for Wikipedia? Darkwikihorse (talk) 13:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 14:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can request unblock here by following the instructions in the block message I've just left. Do not create additional accounts, or we'll just keep blocking them. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 14:33, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darkwikihorse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have nothing to do with vandals and blocking me is a mistake. I did not commit vandalism and it can be seen from my contribution. I thought that administrators such a resource as wikipedia can easily determine such things. I was blocked because I edited the same article as the vandal. Please unblock me. Darkwikihorse (talk) 01:28, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Clear violations of WP:SOCK, compare this with this. Yamla (talk) 11:54, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.