User talk:Darkskynet/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Re: Speedy deletion of Area code 539 and 918

I removed the speedy deletion tag from Area code 539 and 918 since it isn't actually eligible under criterion A3 for speedy deletion, which excludes redirects. I wouldn't recommend nominating it under the criteria for redirects, either, since it's a plausible typo for the article name; if you disagree, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. By the way, thank you for all your hard work updating pages with the new area code 539. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 09:17, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Bloginity

Hi Darkskynet, you got a cool user page. I wanted to thank you for putting an Orphan tag on the Bloginity page. There is currently a conversation about whether the article should be deleted off Wikipedia for promotional reasons and I was hoping you could help us save it, your voice means a lot. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bloginity thanks. (Knox387 (talk) 16:05, 20 January 2011 (UTC)).

Hello, I've looked over the article and it seems to need more body text. Most of the page is links to outside pages and internal links. Adding more "filler" text to the article will help. for example, try adding the story for how the magazine started. The article says "Bloginity Networks is a media company that comprises a number of websites with various areas of coverage." ... explain what all the areas of coverage are ? Try some of these suggestions. Hope it helps. --Darkskynet (talk) 16:36, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Abstractions in AWB

Hi, RE: Abstract logic let me assure you that it is a well written article. I am sure you think AWB (whatever it may be) helps, but I think that article needs no help. Cheers. History2007 (talk) 19:58, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

According to [[1]] the history page i have never edited the Abstract logic page. Please explain. Thanks, --Darkskynet (talk) 21:17, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Cocrete error by myself, I meant Löwenheim number. History2007 (talk) 22:53, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Please continue this conversation on the Talk:Löwenheim_number page. Thanks, --Darkskynet (talk) 23:24, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

RE: New Page Patrol

Hi, It seems that you have been spending some time patrolling the New Page section. I and the other members of WP:RCP really appreciate your efforts, but as you review articles, make sure you are marking them as patrolled. Thanks! Bped1985 (talk) 03:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

No problem i'll do that for now on any edit i make to new pages. Thanks for letting me know, --Darkskynet (talk) 03:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Actually after some looking around Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Feature_requests#Mark_as_patrolled it turns out that there is currently no way for me to mark pages as patrolled using the WP:AWB tool. So because of this too mark them i would have to go behind myself manually and mark them. 80% of the edits i make are simply for formatting issues and not for check the article for anything specific. Your welcome to patrol any new pages i edit. Thanks, --Darkskynet (talk) 05:20, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

I read my talk page, I'm just a bit new here

No I'm not trying to make your life difficult. As I write I'm working to fix a number of very minor issues that have been brought to my attention. In the last hour I have corrected quite a few of them and by evenings end most will ahve been taken care of. Im sorry if you don't approve but you started out once as well. Bear with me, I'm trying to be a good citizen. Lukascb (talk) 22:42, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the response. I have made a page for discussions for this at User_talk:Lukascb/Church would love to hear from you there. Thanks, --Darkskynet (talk) 22:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Church or Parish

Hi, I saw you were watching User:Lucascb's contributions. I have a related question with another WlaKom (talk) and his Connecticut Roman Catholic Parish articles/categories. First, without the inclusion of some building info, I doubted that these articles were notable enough (a look at parish articles in the United States were in states near CT and seemed to also be by him). Second, he insists on sorting the article not based on its name but location (so St. Patrick's Parish, Stamford) is sorted as Stamford. Is there a format for parish articles (and is this correct)? If the article for the church is redirected to a chapter heading, then it too is sorted by location, as opposed to all other church articles on Wikipedia.--James R (talk) 21 Jan 2011

Here's WlaKom's original message, I think this needs mediation -- "Please rewert your edits related to sorting. Parishes are sorted by city as deafault. If you want to sort, additionaly, by name you can add |{{PAGENAME}}. See the mess in Category:Roman Catholic parishes in Connecticut. Do not modify {{DEFAULTSORT:City name}}--WlaKom (talk) 08:34, 21 January 2011 (UTC)"

I don't think user:Lukascb (not to be rude) has any idea he even has a talk page, he has never once responded to anything on his talk page at least from what i can see from skimming through the history of the talk page. He may need to have a hold put on his account at least for a few hours so a admin can point out that there is a talk page with people trying to contact him about all the things he is doing on wikipedia. I am going to mention this to a few admins today and see if there is a way to pull user:Lukascb aside to talk to the user. And also i do agree that the user should be making the page fall in line with the standard that is already setup for places of worship, not make his own guidelines. Thanks, --Darkskynet (talk) 22:23, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

I have made a page for discussions for this at User_talk:Lukascb/Church would love to hear from you there. Thanks, --Darkskynet (talk) 22:56, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

WP:NOTDIR

If you do Boulder Creek HS, I give you a true challenge: to do the over 100 articles I created on high schools in the state of Arizona, all with telephone numbers in the "Information" field. (There is one exception, and it's because these guys do not have a website: Greyhills Academy High School. I think that's reasonable.) Raymie (t • c) 05:14, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Ok, Thanks. I'll leave that one. (Someone else can take it down later if it starts a argument...) If i accidently delete it just go behind me and replace it. Do you know what the formatting on the pages is for the phone numbers ? xxx-xxx-xxxx or xxx(xxx)xxxx or xxx.xxx.xxxx etc.. if you don't know that fine i'll just work around it. Cheers, --Darkskynet (talk) 05:22, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Fernrohr

Hey there, I've just noticed that you've created a long-term abuse report on User:Fernrohr (which I've now tagged for deletion), but it doesn't seem like he meets the criteria for such a report. I've reviewed the pages you've linked, but I've been unable to see any signs of abuse. If you have any questions, feel free to message me on my talk page. Netalarm^talk 19:48, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Sharks took the rest

Hey

I added a bunch of links in to the Sharks_took_the_rest page so i hope its not an orphan article anymore. Could you review it please?

What are you talking about ? also you didnt sign your post ? Darkskynet (talk) 11:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 10:56, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the Holiday greetings, Happy new year! Darkskynet (talk) 20:58, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Darkskynet. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Merry, merry!

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:43, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Darkskynet. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)