User talk:Darkcoucou

January 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Rocketdyne LR-101, from its old location at User:Darkcoucou/Rocketdyne LR-101. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. SK2242 (talk) 20:37, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rocketdyne LR-101 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rocketdyne LR-101. Thanks! Sam-2727 (talk) 00:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Starchaser Industries, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 17:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I will be more careful in the future. Thank you for reminding me. Darkcoucou (talk) 22:05, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited R-27 Zyb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Squib. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Descent propulsion system, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pitch and Yaw.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pyrotechnic valves, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Perseverance.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thrust structure (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thrust structure and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 15:17, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Darkcoucou! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 15:17, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, I'm Butlerblog. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Faithful Word Baptist Church, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Make sure that the style you use just sticks to the facts. Don't editorialize (WP:EDITORIAL). Especially when living persons are part of the content, as is the case here, you must make sure that everything you note is verified in the cited source(s). Please review WP:BLP. Make sure your writing style is encyclopedic, neutral of point of view. If after reviewing this you still don't understand why I reverted your additions, reach out to me with questions, or open a discussion on the article's talk page. ButlerBlog (talk) 12:34, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore the part about "didn't include a source" - the generic notice text isn't 100% fitting. My additional comments (in italics above) cover the issue. ButlerBlog (talk) 12:36, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Butlerblog, thank you for stating your issue with my edit. I am aware that this topic is very sensitive and should be handled carefully. I'd just like to know which part of my edit you are having an issue with specifically, so that I can comply with Wikipedian standards.

The BNN Source states that:

Urban is the german representative of the FWBC, appointed by Anderson: Auf einem Video ist zu sehen, wie der Amerikaner den jungen Sachsen zum „Repräsentanten in Deutschland“ erklärt.
Urban wished death upon Sven Lehmann: Auf Nachfrage sagt der Prediger in sachlichem Tonfall: „Meine Aussage war: Sven Lehmann, Schwuchtel, stirb!“

(Though I admit that sparked outrage almost immediately, even though technically true, sounds inflammatory and should be reworded. Perhaps made headlines in local newspapers would be more fitting? Do you have any suggestions on how to phrase this in a more subtle way?)

I do not know if you can access the BNN Source, as it sadly requires registration to access. Alternatively/Additionally, this source here could be used:

https://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=41179, which also states that:

Urban wants the government to kill queers, Sven Lehmann specifically: In einem neuen Video fordert er den Mord am Queerbeauftragten der Bundesregierung, Sven Lehmann – und an allen queeren Menschen im Land. [...] U.s Antwort auf solche Einwände ist, dass das einzige, was die Regierung tun müsse, sei, die Queers nicht zu beschützen, "sondern sie zu töten". ...expanding on the BNN source.

It does not mention that Urban was appointed by Anderson though.

(... openly encouraged murdering ... should be rephrased as well. What about advocated for a government-supported genocide against queers?)

The remaining claims should be covered by the mannschaft.com source, if I am not mistaken.

I believe that with these changes, my edits should be acceptable, but I'd like to hear your opinion about it first. Please let me know if I missed something important. Darkcoucou (talk) 14:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I originally just tried to edit your additions, but felt it might be better to start with pointing out what I thought was wrong with it first. Based on what you said above, it sounds like you have a pretty good handle on what was most at issue. Take another go at it, keeping in mind that we are an encyclopedia, not tabloid news. Don't sensationalize and don't editorialize. The closer you are to just stating facts, the closer you are to what's acceptable. Also, it sounds to me like there may be some "lost in translation" issues. Be careful how things are presented in English, such as advocated for a government-supported genocide against queers - even that sounds a little inflammatory (although maybe not, if it's what he actually said). In cases where it may be questionable, use WP:ATTRIBUTION (i.e. naming the source). For example, According to [name of source], Urban called for the death of Sven Lehmann (not suggesting verbatim quote here - just providing a "for instance" example). If you have another go at it and I still think there are remaining issues, I'll just edit the existing copy at that point. ButlerBlog (talk) 15:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I made some changes and re-published the edit. It still sounds a little extreme, but sadly I can hardly avoid that due to how hateful this man is.

Thank you for your assistance. I hope this will satisfy the demands. Darkcoucou (talk) 15:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Thrust structure

Hello, Darkcoucou. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thrust structure, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Thrust structure

Hello, Darkcoucou. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Thrust structure".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:33, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]