User talk:Darkcook

Hello Darkcook, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! VanTucky ^Talk 01:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Kryptonsite

Because it's still a fansite, and those "spoilers" are usually attributed to nameless sources, thus making them unreliable. The only time Kryptonsite has been cited has been when they have conducted a one-on-one interview personally (like a lot of the interviews they have about the new characters and storylines for season 8... see Smallville (season 8)). Aside from that, I wouldn't accept USA Today if they reported from a scooper, and I'm often against using Ausiello (TV Guide's scooper guy) because he uses "insiders". When you cannot attribute the information to an actual name, it's hard to call it reliable (note I say reliable and not "true", verifiability is not about what is "true"). Hope this answers your question. P.S. I personally use Kryptonsite to satsify my fan needs all the time, I find it to be an excellent source of information...just not for an encyclopedia. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 20:08, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's easy, the wiki bosses think Kryptonsite is "fan based" and unreliable, even though they're are not. I've found Kryptonsite 100% reliable and their list in rumorville of directors was pretty accurate. You won't get them to change their minds. 65.92.164.179 (talk) 21:44, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sorry

Sorry, looking at the History on that page, it appeared that you were the one vandalizing the page. Thanks for helping!Kevinbrogers (talk) 20:27, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! If you find any other information, let me know... Kevinbrogers (talk) 20:32, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Darkcook! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 131 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Seth Hoffman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:20, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Seth Hoffman

The article Seth Hoffman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable BLP, only source is IMDb

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 08:29, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]