User talk:DariusJersey

Come on chat!

Lord Connétable

Cities don't automatically get Lord Mayors or Lord Provosts - although Lord Connétable exudes a certain unique cachet, n'est-che pon? Man vyi 13:21, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bailiff

The powers of the Bailiff may continue to be pared away, a situation that the current incumbent Sir Phillip Bailhache himself advocated in an article for the Jersey Law Society.

He continues for the time being to chair States debates but his future in the States must be coming to an end, even if the status quo were permissible under Jersey’s international obligations, the absurdity of paying someone so much to complete a task that is menial for a man of his undoubted abilities does not square with a government committed to cutting waste from its expenditure.

Too much comment and, dare I say, wishful thinking, rather than encyclopaedic content. Certainly the powers of the Bailiff have dwindled drastically since the days of the hereditary Bailiffs, and the reader might reasonably draw a conclusion as to the historical inevitability of the process from an explanation of the historical development. Producing a manifesto-like set of statements is somewhat tendentious, though. Man vyi 18:31, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you prodded me into writing up some historical background! Man vyi 12:50, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Jersey etc

Yes, I'm planning to go on the walk. Re: Jersey Green Party - no-one's told me it's revived! Man vyi 14:57, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello DariusJersey! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 137 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Judy Martin (Jersey politician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:16, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello DariusJersey! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

New deal for page patrollers

Hi DariusJersey,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Darius J. Pearce for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darius J. Pearce is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darius J. Pearce until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:38, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 10:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]