User talk:Dare Devil Dare

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 10:59, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to add source Dare Devil Dare (talk) 11:03, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on M. N. Roy

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page M. N. Roy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:21, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm DaxServer. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Meghalaya seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 10:57, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Meghalaya, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 11:07, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well the source is of course reliable. Dare Devil Dare (talk) 11:09, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not. Please read WP:RS, WP:RSP and try this one: Help:Introduction to referencing/reliable sources quiz — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 11:12, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on M. N. Roy

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page M. N. Roy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:36, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 - again

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Languages of India, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 19:49, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Languages with official status in India. - Arjayay (talk) 19:50, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't fear being blocked. Jokes apart, one thing I found while going through your talk page, I took my birth four days after you created your Wiki account. Dare Devil Dare (talk) 21:53, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Dare Devil Dare. Thank you. Jc3s5h (talk) 21:29, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Partial block

You have been blocked indefinitely from article space for major sourcing problems as demonstrated in your editing and in this ANI thread. This block means that you can't edit articles directly. I recommend you to use article talk pages to request edits, then request unblock once you have demonstrated a better understanding of our sourcing requirements. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 11:53, 30 August 2023 (UTC).[reply]

A long time,,,, now please unblock me. Dare Devil Dare (talk) 05:19, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dare Devil Dare (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well, I swear to God I shall not create any hindrance as I did, and I have understood my guilt. Pls unblock me. Dare Devil Dare (talk) 06:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't need you to swear to God. We just need you to do as you were asked above, demonstrate a better understanding of sourcing requirements. The best way to do that is through making edit requests on article talk pages to propose edits. Once your requests start to succeed and show your understanding, you should request unblock then. You haven't edited since you were blocked, so I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:41, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.