User talk:DanyVega

The article First theory of Cinthia del Carmen has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Edison (talk) 03:27, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article First theory of Cinthia del Carmen has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Edison (talk) 03:36, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Edison (talk) 03:36, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not place spurious "protected" templates on articles that are not protected. If the subject of the article you have twice created has substantial coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources, as is required by the Wikipedia policies on verifiability and notability, please let me know on my talk page. As the article was created, it appeared to be nonsense. Cinthia's grandmother had 75 daughters and 83 sons? That would seem to be biologically impossible. What is the context for this person? History? Mythology? Literature? Is there a reference for the extraordinary claims you made in the article? Thanks. Edison (talk) 03:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Second theory of Cinthia del Carmen has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Edison (talk) 03:47, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First theory of Cinthia del Carmen has been deleted yet again after a speedy deletion nomination stating it has insufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Edison (talk) 03:49, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. Edison (talk) 03:47, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

per your post: note that 7.5 is not the same as 75, and 7.5 is an unusual number of aunts. An aunt without legs still counts as one aunt. The articles sound as nonsensical as ever. The warning against further such postings stands. To help you get started on Wikipedia, I will extend to you a warm welcome. Regards. Edison (talk) 04:08, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, DanyVega, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Edison (talk) 04:08, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]