User talk:Danvera

Welcome!

NowCommons: Image:Fraser EriccsonMeml.jpg

Image:Fraser EriccsonMeml.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Fraser Ericsson Memorial.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Fraser Ericsson Memorial.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fraser EriccsonAdventure.jpg is now available as Commons:Image:Fraser Ericsson Adventure.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fraser Ericcson-Labor.jpg is now available as Commons:Image:Fraser Ericsson Labor.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fraser EriccsonVision.jpg is now available as Commons:Image:Fraser Ericsson Vision.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

George Moore (novelist)‎

You added an LBSG category to George Moore. I was involved in the last featured article review using many sources to provide inline citations and in all the sources I consulted and despite the homosexual elements in some of his work, I have not seen any verifiable proof that he was gay. This is not mentioned anywhere in the article and I just did a quick review online and cannot find any reliable source to support this. Do you have such a source? Otherwise it is just hearsay or synthesis. ww2censor (talk) 00:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. I have added the citation to the Brian Lacey book which speaks to Moore's sexuality. Many thanks for your suggestion.--Wondermachine (talk) 07:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As the casual Wikipedian won't have easy access to Lacey's book, could you perhaps include relevant information from (and about) the book in the article? For example: on what evidence does Lacey base his claim? How has Lacey's conclusion been received academically? From what ww2censor says above, this may not be a widely-held idea about Moore, so how does including Lacey's conclusions hold up against WP:UNDUE? Thanks. Aylad ['ɑɪlæd] 18:25, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Franciscan Monastery Brookland DC.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Franciscan Monastery Brookland DC.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:29, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rvzlogo.gif missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Rvzlogo.gif is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Danvera. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Danvera. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Joni Mitchell. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Graham87 (talk) 03:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reliable source is Wikipedia's own listing of Order of Canada recipients and their election dates. Wondermachine (talk) 04:10, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a reliable source for itself; we need a reference that specifically describes Mitchell, Lightfoot, and Cohen in that way. Graham87 (talk) 10:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]