User talk:Dantescifi

Welcome!

Hello, Dantescifi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as BDF-521, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 06:36, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about COSMOS 1161898

Hello, Dantescifi,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether COSMOS 1161898 should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/COSMOS 1161898 .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Lithopsian (talk) 19:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about COSMOS 2607238

Hello, Dantescifi,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether COSMOS 2607238 should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/COSMOS 2607238 .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Lithopsian (talk) 19:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve HDF 4-473.0

Thanks you for contributing to Draft:HDF 4-473.0. While this object was one of the most distant astronomical objects in 1998-99 it might not meet the notablity guidelines at WP:NASTRO to warrant an article. The current article is little more than a dictionary definition and there are very few references that mention this galaxy to expand the article. Please let me know if you need any help. --mikeu ^talk 23:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)}}[reply]

HDF 4-473.0 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, HDF 4-473.0, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:HDF 4-473.0 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:HDF 4-473.0, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Names of large numbers, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 18:04, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Harrison Park High School listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Harrison Park High School. Since you had some involvement with the Harrison Park High School redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:00, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Haddonfield High School (Halloween) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Haddonfield High School (Halloween). Since you had some involvement with the Haddonfield High School (Halloween) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:01, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Stalked by a Movie Star" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stalked by a Movie Star. Since you had some involvement with the Stalked by a Movie Star redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:21, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Mark Stenwyck" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mark Stenwyck and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 26#Mark Stenwyck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 04:09, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]