User talk:Danielwork

Welcome

Hello, Danielwork! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Satori Son 16:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter Brian Albers

A tag has been placed on Peter Brian Albers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Timneu22 · talk 11:02, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vigdis Røising

The article Vigdis Røising has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I have found no third party reliable sources to show any sort of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 01:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Øyvind Torseter

The article Øyvind Torseter has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Empty Buffer (talk) 11:09, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christian Skolmen

The article Christian Skolmen has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cnilep (talk) 22:27, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Osvaldo Palazzi

The article Osvaldo Palazzi has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cnilep (talk) 23:28, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the PROD on the assumption that Palazzi may be deceased. Note, though, that the page still needs references to reliable sources for verification. Cnilep (talk) 18:41, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hans Petter Sjøli

The article Hans Petter Sjøli has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Empty Buffer (talk) 10:51, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hans Petter Sjøli

A tag has been placed on Hans Petter Sjøli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Empty Buffer (talk) 17:33, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Holger Lissner

The article Holger Lissner has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Stickee (talk) 09:11, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lazăr Sfera

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lazăr Sfera, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://eu-football.info/_match.php?id=6280. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:21, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Technical requirements related to translating pages

Hello, Danielwork. Thank you so much for all your contributions to English Wikipedia. In the past three months you appear to have created dozens of new articles. This is an accomplishment to be proud of, and a great service to the project.

I noticed that Dine Penger is very similar to no:Dine Penger, to which you include an interwiki link. Am I right in assuming that you translated the English page from the Norwegian one? If so, Wikipedia licensing requires that the source of a translated page be credited. In other words, if an editor translates a page from Norwegian Wikipedia and adds that translation to English Wikipedia, some credit must be given to the Norwegian source page.

To give credit to a source page, name the original-language page and indicate that you translated it in the edit summary. Then add {{Translated page}} to the Talk page of the new English page. If you have translated pages without indicating so in the edit summary, adding the {{Translated page}} template to the talk page after the fact may adhere to the spirit of the policy (though I Am Not A Lawyer).

I know it seems like a hassle to ask someone who has done the hard work of translating to go back and do the additional work of adding these templates, but it is necessary in order to comply with Wikipedia's license and the legal copyright of contributors to the original page.

See Wikipedia:Translation and Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia for more information. Happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 22:20, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Einar Myklebust

The article Einar Myklebust has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Marcus Qwertyus 22:43, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jaume Sisa

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Jaume Sisa. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jaume Sisa

The article Jaume Sisa has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 00:49, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jaume Sisa

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Jaume Sisa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Active Banana (talk) 17:50, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Heiða

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Heiða requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 15:51, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bård Kvalheim

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Bård Kvalheim. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bård Kvalheim

The article Bård Kvalheim has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 15:01, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Danielwork! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 2 of the articles that you created are currently tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 415 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Bamba Bakary - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Yannick Plissonneau - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:28, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anne Shilcock

The article Anne Shilcock has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 16:35, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chloé Georges

The article Chloé Georges has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Throwaway85 (talk) 11:20, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Sébastien Morel, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Please don't make dates or years into links - it clutters up Wikipedia's indexes & slows things down. Please read Wikipedia:YEARLINK#Specific_cases. Thanks. Trafford09 (talk) 11:18, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Linda Steen

A tag has been placed on Linda Steen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cindamuse (talk) 10:51, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Anders K. Orvin. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 07:08, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply to concerns

Hello Danielwork. I have a concern - probably shared by others - that you don't read Talk pages - even your own. Please prove me wrong by adding a comment of your own, here under mine.

The reason for my concern is that myself & other editors have had issues with your editing style.

We have left helpful tips for you here, but there is no evidence you have read any of them.

Indeed, the pie-chart of your edits shows that all your contributions - bar none - have been edits to Wikipedia articles. You have never - on this account - edited a Talk page, even for the articles you've copied from Scandinavian Wikipedias (which seems to be your sole reason for the account?) & have been proposed for deletion.

My guess is that you are Scandinavian, and it would be refreshing to know that you spoke and understood English - as many Scandinavians of course are excellent English-readers and indeed -speakers.

Wikipedia works on wp:consensus, and therefore it's important to know that all editors can communicate here in English and collaborate.

Please respond here. Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 07:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggesting a Community Ban

I have suggested that the Wikipedia community bans you, until such time as you address the concerns that the community has raised on your talk page.

Your behaviour is being discussed here:

~~Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Danielwork_-_ignoring_consensus_.26_others.27_talk~~

Trafford09 (talk) 07:35, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI - discusssion preserved at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive636#User:Danielwork - ignoring consensus & others' talk. Trafford09 (talk) 10:13, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hervé Mirouze

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Hervé Mirouze. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010 continued

Can you read and understand English?

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in André Gascard, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
I know it's not your style to read any hints that other editors go to the trouble of putting here on your talk page (e.g. wp:ES#Always provide an edit summary). But here goes yet again ...

As I advised you on an earlier edit, this formatting of yours is wrong:

"André Gascard ... born 16 November ...".

Correct linking is:

"André Gascard ... born 16 November ...".

We live in hope that you'll eventually read and follow these warnings. Trafford09 (talk) 11:06, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hope diminishing

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Fulke Walwyn. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 06:49, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Sofia Lind. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you.

I know you can't (or don't) read English, but see above sections for why you are still failing re wp:MOS. Trafford09 (talk) 06:53, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Koldo Serra

The article Koldo Serra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Director and screenwriter of non-notable films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Minima c (talk) 11:02, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TOTD

Tip of the day...

Please summarize your work using the Edit summary box

If you make anything other than a minor edit to an article, it helps others if you fill in the edit summary. Edit summaries are visible in the page history, watchlists, and on Recent changes, so they help other users keep track of what is happening to a page.

If you use section editing, the summary box is filled in with the section heading by default (in gray text), which you can follow with more detail. You also can put links to articles in the edit summary. Just put double brackets around [[the article title]] like you would normally. The summary is limited to 255 characters, so many people use common abbreviations, such as sp for correcting spelling mistakes, rm for remove, ce for copy-edit, etc.

Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip

Speedy deletion nomination of Zeka Laplaine

A tag has been placed on Zeka Laplaine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WikiTome ^Talk 12:12, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Condica capensis

Hello Daniel, thank you for adding moth species. While I appreciate the effort, the article was somewhat of a mess. Could I give you some pointers? When making a species it is easiest to copy an article of a related species to your text editor and changing the stuff that needs changing (the authority, name, etc.), that way, you always have a working taxobox and categories. If you need any help, please let me know. FYI: I edited the Condica capensis article, please have a look what I changed. Ruigeroeland (talk) 09:23, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pierluigi Borghetti

The article Pierluigi Borghetti has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 12:09, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pierluigi Borghetti

The article Pierluigi Borghetti has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 11:36, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Kudpung (talk) 17:45, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Events at the 2002 Winter Olympics

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Events at the 2002 Winter Olympics. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - 2002 Winter Olympics. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2002 Winter Olympics - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CTJF83 chat 20:38, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lesly Bengaber

The article Lesly Bengaber has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Top Jim (talk) 09:33, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Nordlandsposten, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I don't think you speak English (prove me wrong?), but your latest article YET AGAIN has links to dates, which (as has frequently been pointed out to you) breaks the Manual Of Style. Trafford09 (talk) 22:26, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lars-Göran Lönnermark

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Lars-Göran Lönnermark. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Vic Roberts. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. As stated so often, don't link dates. Trafford09 (talk) 23:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jean-Carl Boucher

A tag has been placed on Jean-Carl Boucher requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- mitchsurp -- (talk) 03:40, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Mickey and the Beanstalk. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Still not prepared (or able?) to discuss Edit Summaries? Trafford09 (talk) 22:59, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Ludvig Nessa, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. I don't think you can read English (prove me wrong?), but you're running out of chances to desist linking dates (as stated often, earlier). Trafford09 (talk) 23:01, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Olympic articles

I noticed you've been creating a lot of Olympic Event related articles recently. Many of the articles you've been creating include the {{WikiProject Olympics Winter Other olympic article Table}} template in the actual article. This template appears to be intended for the Wikiproject to keep track of what articles have been created so far. It is clearly not intended to be included in the articles themselves. Please be sure to not include this template in any other articles you've created, and also please remove it from any articles you've created recently. Thanks. SnottyWong ^converse 23:08, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yves Jacques

Hello. This message is to inform you that I removed your reference addition(s) to Yves Jacques. No text was provided for the reference, and it was causing a cite error. When you have the time, please re-add the reference with more details. Thanks. Akerans (talk) 02:46, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Complement. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 16:51, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your CV so far

I don't think you speak English - I've invited you to prove me wrong so many times. However, I'll summarise your contributions to date, with their misdemeanours. This is for the benefit of any admin. who reviews your case.

You've never used any Talk page - even this, your own - to seek consensus, collaborate with, or address any other editors' concerns - as shown here in your pie-chart of edits. To you, wp:collaborations seem an alien concept.
You've been reminded about wp:consensus, but again to no avail.
You persistently and flagrantly refused to provide a wp:Edit summary with _any_ edit so far.
Ditto re linking of dates.

IMHO, the project would benefit greatly by your being blocked _until_ such time as you prove you can at least read and write English. Do you have anything to say? Anything at all? Even in your defence? (That'll be the day.) Trafford09 (talk) 17:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

The next time you violate Wikipedia's Manual of Style by using disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Sigrid Boo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please see the preceding section, for details of this user's persistent & flagrant misdemeanours. Trafford09 (talk) 17:11, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hectorthebat

Do you have any relation to User:Hectorthebat? Rettetast (talk) 17:47, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond. I suspect that you are a sock puppet of the above mentioned account. If I don't get a response this account will probably be blocked. Rettetast (talk) 13:43, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This account is now blocked from editing since you are a sock puppet of User:Hectorthebat. Please use that account if you want to make an appeal. Rettetast (talk) 16:04, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of La Patère Rose

The article La Patère Rose has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources indicating notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SQGibbon (talk) 04:30, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Filip Polc

The article Filip Polc has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 02:47, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bamba Bakary

The article Bamba Bakary has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Epbr123 (talk) 17:42, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michel Gervais

The article Michel Gervais has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Epbr123 (talk) 12:07, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This user has been blocked by an administrator at 23:00, 2 November 2010 with an expiry time of indefinite. --Kudpung (talk) 01:33, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Armand Seguin

The article Armand Seguin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

DAB page with only red links

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magioladitis (talk) 02:25, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roar Tank

The article Roar Tank has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced WP:BLP The no.Wiki BIBSYS article has no reliable third party sources. Further research fails to reveal any sources that meet criteria at WP:CREATIVE for authors.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:17, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion Speedy Deletion of Kreis Sebnitz

The article Kreis Sebnitz has been ~~proposed for deletion~~ recommended for deletion under the Criteria for Speedy Deletion because of the following concern: :No sources, very little content and the log only shows 5 edits in nearly 3 years. G5, page created by a blocked / banned user.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may ~~prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or~~ contest this Speedy Deletion by clicking the 'Contest this deletion' button and leaving a rationale on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MIVP - (Can I Help?) (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) 10:32, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is believed that this Article now benefits for the Criteria for Speedy Deletion under WP:CSD#G5 because you are a blocked user. Your attempts from your first account were appreciated. Well... until you broke the rules. MIVP - (Can I Help?) (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) 12:01, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Game no Kanzume Vol. 2

The article Game no Kanzume Vol. 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 23:20, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Raja Al Hoceima

The article Raja Al Hoceima has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable football club with a badly written article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 00:38, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vigdis Røising

The article Vigdis Røising has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actress who only was in a few roles during her short career

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 19:30, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ignace Morgenstern moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ignace Morgenstern, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 06:56, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ignace Morgenstern

Hello, Danielwork. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ignace Morgenstern".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 23:37, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gilles Tanguy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gilles Tanguy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilles Tanguy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rashinseita (talk) 00:37, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Johan Hallström for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johan Hallström is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johan Hallström until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 16:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bushy's Brewery

The article Bushy's Brewery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 12:01, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Flo, fjell og fjære: Jostein Flo utforsker Vestlandet

The article Flo, fjell og fjære: Jostein Flo utforsker Vestlandet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 11:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]