User talk:Dandandandandandandan

Welcome

Hello, Dandandandandandandan, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! D P 15:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Dandandandandandandan, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Dandandandandandandan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmation

I have granted your request at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Confirmed. This is truly a rare event. Congratulations. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:33, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Paolo Giubellino

Hello! Your submission of Paolo Giubellino at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 15:25, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pee po belly bum drawers, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Hell In A Bucket (talk) 21:47, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. D P 21:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dandandandandandandan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Erm, I've not "Edit warred" per the definitions of it. I don't understand why you've blocked me after just two undo edits - I guess you are assuming that I'm a sock. That's a bit shit, isn't it? Assuming guilt - and hey, we'll check the evidence later? Dandandandandandandan (talk) 21:52, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Consider reading Joys of Yiddish by Leo Rosten. I think you might find the bit on chutzpah interesting. NW (Talk) 22:00, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, my reason was clear both in the block log, and above. You can, as per the definition, be edit-warring with a single edit - you made two. D P 21:58, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:DangerousPanda is referring to the edits also made by your sockpuppet as confirmed here by checkuser, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pee po belly bum drawers. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 22:00, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Pee po belly bum drawers (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here. ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]