Jump to content

User talk:Dance of a Nymph

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Repoulis (June 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:54, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Dance of a Nymph, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:54, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Dance of a Nymph, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! GtstrickyTalk or C 17:20, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

June 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Michael Repoulis, from its old location at User:Dance of a Nymph/sandbox/Michael Repoulis. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:28, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Repoulis (June 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:32, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to List of classical guitarists appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Julietdeltalima (talk) 23:48, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to List of composers for the classical guitar appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. NewYorkActuary (talk) 00:56, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Michael Repoulis

[edit]

Draft:Michael Repoulis, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Michael Repoulis and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Michael Repoulis during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 02:21, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Repoulis (July 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 02:25, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dance of a Nymph, your draft is being considered for deletion. This happened because you kept resubmitting the draft without providing reliable sources, despite being asked repeatedly.
In fact, since the above notice was posted earlier toady, you resubmitted this article again, and you still haven't addressed the issue. This makes four times in three days. If nothing else, please slow down!
I promise you, the problem has nothing to do with the locations of links within your article. The problem is with the links themselves: those sources simply aren't enough. You can keep making small edits and resubmitting, but you can't establish notability this way, so Wikipedia will keep rejecting the article.
On a positive note, if Michael becomes more notable, then Wikipedia may accept the article. For instance, if a large magazine or newspaper wrote an article on him, that could establish notability. Player 03 (talk) 12:40, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Repoulis (July 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 12:59, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Michael Repoulis has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Repoulis. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 13:39, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Draft:Michael Repoulis‎. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 18:09, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Repoulis (July 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jcc was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:39, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]