User talk:Dana Easton

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	HELLO :) <3 i. M STEPHINE SABATE ALUDO. U CANT BE MY FRIEND? Stephine sabate aludo (talk) 19:30, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hello, Dana Easton, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help.We're so glad you're here! Matthewvetter (talk) 17:17, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Yes, each and every sentence that has facts listed about Harriet Tubman have a hyper linked reference attached to them.

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? After reading an article about her, I think that it was proportionately out together very well. It first started out by discussing her early life and education, and then lead to her childhood history, with descriptions of her family members and places she lived in. Continuing on down the article, it went more in depth about her escape from slavery. It also listed her journey's and methods she took on throughout her life.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? I would have to say that this article was neutral, because it just stated legitimate facts about history and series of events.

Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that biased noted? These sources come from other civil rights activists during her same period of time she was living, and also other sources about the Underground Railroad.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I would say some viewpoints might be underrepresented due to the fact that this occurred so long ago, and that might have caused a lack of the viewpoint. Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article? Yes, the links do work. To my knowledge, there is no plagiarism in this article.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? Everything in this article is correct for the factual dates of the time Harriet Tubman was alive.