User talk:Dan Vs. is discontinued

May 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Dan Vs. episodes has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Dan Vs. episodes was changed by Dan Vs. is discontinued (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.94463 on 2015-05-28T20:09:10+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:09, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(personal attack removed)Dan Vs. is discontinued (talk) 20:55, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Dan Vs. episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:11, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

'(personal attack removed) Dan Vs. is discontinued (talk) 20:55, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of Dan Vs. episodes, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:13, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ignored (personal attack removed) Dan Vs. is discontinued (talk) 20:57, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Dan Vs. episodes. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:17, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(personal attack removed) Dan Vs. is discontinued (talk) 20:57, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Dan_Vs._is_discontinued reported by User:Weegeerunner (Result: ). Thank you. Weegeerunner (talk) 20:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(personal attack removed) Dan Vs. is discontinued (talk) 20:57, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Dan Vs. episodes. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:47, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(personal attack removed) Dan Vs. is discontinued (talk) 20:57, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's a real bad idea to act uncivil like that. Weegeerunner (talk) 21:04, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The reasons for your block include disruptive editing, edit warring, and repeated personal attacks. --MelanieN (talk) 21:07, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dan Vs. is discontinued (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dan Vs. has been cancelled due to fucking critical acclaim and scandals, also, all users (such as Geraldo Perez and ToonLucas22) are fucking shits, while MelanieN, Ponyo and MusikAnimal are sons of bitches, so Fuck ME, fuck MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE....................... Dan Vs. is discontinued (talk) 21:13, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 21:16, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.