User talk:DanMeister1234

Captain (football

You should be aware that such a page already exists at Captain (football). Not sure what the correct deletion policy is for the page you've created but I suspect it may not be long before it is deleted. Dpmuk (talk) 10:28, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of FA Premier League 2004-05 Review

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Calaka (talk) 14:11, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, DanMeister1234! I am Calaka and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Calaka (talk) 14:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arsenal FC Season 2004-05 Review

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Calaka (talk) 14:20, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of FA Premier League 2004-05 Season Review

The article FA Premier League 2004-05 Season Review has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Original research, redundant to 2004–05 FA Premier League.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Hysteria18 ^{(Talk • Contributions)} 15:52, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

Hey there. Sorry for deleting your articles. But thank you for coming forward and communicating about the issue. It is a right step. Now as to your articles, I have asked for some Wikipedians to write on your page and help you re: the issue and all the articles that you have been making. But just a small note on me: the articles you are creating are more or less covered somewhere else and you would do best to improve on the ones already established. Hopefully a few others would have more to say. Kind regards.Calaka (talk) 10:48, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it most likely will (but that decision will rest on an administrators opinion). I mean there is already this article: 2004–05_FA_Premier_League so there is no need for the review/summary that you made. Check this link out aswell: WP:OR. Also check this out: Wikipedia:New_contributors'_help_page#User_needs_help._User:DanMeister1234. If you need any more help do not hesitate to ask. Cheers.Calaka (talk) 12:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An alternative way to save your article

You expressed concern about possible deletion of an article you are working on. There's an experiment in progress specifically for cases such as this. See Wikipedia:Article Incubator. If this option makes sense to you, see item 2 under "how it works". You can move the page and avoid the deletion police (assuming no major issues such as copy violations). Add the template as noted in item 3.

Hope this helps.

If you have any questions about how to accomplish this, let me know.--SPhilbrick T 12:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of FA Premier League 2004-05 Season Review

I have nominated FA Premier League 2004-05 Season Review, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FA Premier League 2004-05 Season Review. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. – Hysteria18 ^{(Talk • Contributions)} 11:23, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of FA Premier League 2004-05 Season Review

I have nominated FA Premier League 2004-05 Season Review, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FA Premier League 2004-05 Season Review. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. – Hysteria18 ^{(Talk • Contributions)} 11:32, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the duplicate notification there. Either I or Twinkle did something wrong :) – Hysteria18 ^{(Talk • Contributions)} 11:33, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aston Villa FC 2004-05 Season

A tag has been placed on Aston Villa FC 2004-05 Season, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

an unneeded article without enough backed up information. No added bonus to wikipedia

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pianoplonkers (talk) 17:34, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of South Africa vs West Indies at 2003 Cricket World Cup

The article South Africa vs West Indies at 2003 Cricket World Cup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't know if there's a CSD category for this, but this was a group match in the 2003 Cricket World Cup, and we don't have articles for individual games (except the Final) in a tournament.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 16:41, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page South Africa vs West Indies at 2003 Cricket World Cup. Blank pages are malicious to Wikipedia as they often confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the deletion process for how to proceed. tetraedycal, tetraedycal 17:13, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 13:45, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to 2003 Cricket World Cup group stage, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Noom _talk ^contribs 22:01, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2004-05 - What the dickens?

What exactly are you trying to achieve by putting details of EVERY SINGLE MATCH from the 2004-05 Premier League season on its page - apart from cluttering it, of course? You're not going to be able to get details of all (approx.) 380 matches on the page. Why not put the match summaries onto the individual pages for the club's seasons instead? For example: 2004-05 Charlton Athletic F.C. season. Look and learn mate. Imlikeaboss (talk) 08:41, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malenipple.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Malenipple.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DanMeister1234. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Moyes managing Sunderland.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Moyes managing Sunderland.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:43, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DanMeister1234. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]