User talk:DanMat6288

License tagging for Image:Miguzi-erin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Miguzi-erin.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:12, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Pencak Silat

I added the section on Pencak Silat in Code Lyoko. Angie Y. (talk) 22:15, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. DanMat6288 (talk) 15:44, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added a lot of actual and factual information, too! =D Angie Y. (talk) 16:11, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see that. ^^ DanMat6288 (talk) 17:49, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It got reverted by User:Beemer69 but I managed to put it back in. Angie Y. (talk) 16:26, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Content removed because most of it is rambling in-universe format and does not belong. This section does not need to be turned into an extension of the Code Lyoko network of articles. Beemer 69 23:39, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who said you could get into this? Angie Y. (talk) 21:14, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Newsflash: It got axed. Angie Y. (talk) 13:30, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P. Silat at its prettiest

[1] Angie Y. (talk) 19:58, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dil's Close Encounter of the Third Kind

Hello, DanMat6288. You have new messages at Talk:Dil Pickles#Dil's Close Encounter of the Third Kind.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{newmessages}} template.

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Earthmon-roachster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Earthmon-roachster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Earthmon-krabe.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Earthmon-krabe.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article move

Hi, I've moved List of Time Squad characters back to it's original title as it seemed an odd move and that the Wikiproject overseeing Cartoon Network articles would prefer a standard to titling articles under it's remit. Nothing personal is meant by it, just looking to keep order within related articles, check WP:TOON/MOS for more information. Thanks for your time. treelo _radda 21:58, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The move I made follows the name formatting of a lot of character lists, including List of Ben 10 characters, which was recently moved to said name in the same manner; I'd imagine anything related to Ben 10 would fall under the same WikiProject as anything related to Time Squad. --DanMat6288 (talk) 01:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Might be a lot doing it in that way but there's a lot which also do it the way I told you about. That move shouldn't have happened as it would come under the same scope for the Wikiproject as did Time Squad and the titling of that list is terrible anyway seeing as it covers two series (and will most likely cover the third series) but implies it only covers the one, I'm digressing but I think it's the Nickelodeon Wikiproject having the opposing title convention causing the confusion. I'll have to see what to do about that Ben 10 character list besides it being a crufty clusterfuck but at least you know now huh? treelo _radda 01:29, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem, List of Quack Pack episodes

Hi. List of Quack Pack episodes was tagged for copyright concerns on May 20th and listed Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2009 May 20, but you were evidently not notified. The edit summaries are evidently taken from an external source, tv.com. These summaries are marked copyrighted, and the source's copyright information page of the source notes that "All materials published on our sites, including, but not limited to, written content, photographs, graphics, images, illustrations, marks, logos, sound or video clips, and Flash animation, are protected by our copyrights or trademarks or those of our partners. You may not modify, publish, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, reproduce, create derivative works of, distribute, publicly perform, publicly display, or in any way exploit any of the materials or content on our sites in whole or in part." Before administrative closure of this, I thought to ask you if you'd like the opportunity to rewrite those edit summaries in your own words or if you had received permission to use this text. I'll relist it for another seven days to give you an opportunity to respond. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:50, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dakota

I noticed some vandalism on the Dakota page earlier today so I had been watching closely when your edit appeared. I don't know how it was connected do Dakota's disambiguation page so I deleted it. I did not know whether or not it was vandalism but if it was, then please be aware of Wikipedia's zero-tolerance of vandalism policy. If not, then I apologize for the mistake. If you believe it should be placed on the page, then please let me know the reason on my talk page. Thanks for listening, W M 2 01:59, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I quickly scanned the link provided with the edit so I did not see that. One common characteristic of vandalism is an edit that seems to be jumbled together as a string of letters and characters rather than a short description of the what the link leads to or the title of the article/article section. After your message, I more thoroughly read the link and saw what you meant. I apologize for the error. I'll replace it as soon as possible. Thanks for understanding, W M 2 21:48, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Biting Pear of Salamanca

The article The Biting Pear of Salamanca has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Only sources are primary.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:58, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Blame twinkle for the misaimed warning. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 22:56, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Biting Pear of Salamanca for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article The Biting Pear of Salamanca, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Biting Pear of Salamanca until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 02:14, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DanMat6288. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ACNH listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ACNH. Since you had some involvement with the ACNH redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 14:39, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of My Life as a Teenage Robot characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of My Life as a Teenage Robot characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of My Life as a Teenage Robot characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sparkl^talk 18:55, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jill Roberts (Chuck)

The article Jill Roberts (Chuck) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appeared in all of 4 episodes. No evidence of significant coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]